-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
macOS Fixes, main branch (2024.10.26.) #755
Merged
stephenswat
merged 3 commits into
acts-project:main
from
krasznaa:macOSFixes-main-20241026
Oct 26, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW could consider following ACTS' change to only list the initial year instead of updating files.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm actually partial to the convention we have in the ATLAS offline code, where we show the last modification date of each file. 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure. We had a discussion about this, and ultimately decided not to duplicate modification date (that's what blame is for) since it avoids it getting out of date, and the actual year being legally meaningless anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah strong support for the ACTS style of not updating these; avoids a lot of pain in the rear and it has zero legal meaning.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You guys are making it sound like it's a black and white issue. But it's very much a shade of grey in my mind.
For instance, what about when we re-design some code. Let's say we break up a class into two separate classes, with "new" names. What would be the appropriate date on the files of the new classes? Would one use the current year? The year when the original class was written?
In the scheme that we've been using so far in the R&D projects, the new files would reflect both that their code came from an earlier time, and that that code has now moved into a new place.
Paul is correct, even we discussed about this in the past. There can be different legitimate conventions for this. But given that the convention in this repository has not been the one lobbied for now, if we want to switch to that convention, we need to do it clearly.
I.e. somebody should open a PR, and update all files accordingly. 🤔 And update the contribution guide. (I'm just kidding. I meant write a contribution guide...)