Fix broken assertion in prune tracks kernel #828
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stephenswat
added
bug
krasznaa
approved these changes
Jan 29, 2025
Of course not. :D |
Mea culpa, I made a mistake in a recent assertion added to the `prune_tracks` kernel which was too assertive, requiring an equality relation rather than a greater-or-equal relation between the number of tips and the number of tracks.
stephenswat
force-pushed
the
fix/prune_tracks_assert
branch
from
3d2cb5d to
47a016d
Compare
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Mea culpa, I made a mistake in a recent assertion added to the
prune_trackskernel which was too assertive, requiring an equality relation rather than a greater-or-equal relation between the number of tips and the number of tracks.