-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix regression in case sensitivity for is
/matches
operator
#3399
Merged
jfdoming
merged 9 commits into
actualbudget:master
from
jfdoming:jfdoming/fix-case-sensitive-regexp-match
Sep 28, 2024
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
55ff029
Fix regression in case sensitivity for `is`/`matches` operators
jfdoming b58fea6
Add test
jfdoming 5f6a356
Add release notes
jfdoming 6cfff5a
Fix failing tests
jfdoming 8348614
Merge branch 'master' into jfdoming/fix-case-sensitive-regexp-match
jfdoming 060d4bf
Merge branch 'master' into jfdoming/fix-case-sensitive-regexp-match
jfdoming d6c7e45
Merge branch 'master' into jfdoming/fix-case-sensitive-regexp-match
jfdoming 7f84dc1
Merge branch 'master' into jfdoming/fix-case-sensitive-regexp-match
youngcw bf42f57
Merge branch 'master' into jfdoming/fix-case-sensitive-regexp-match
jfdoming File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use
getValidOps
consistently.Consider using
getValidOps
consistently to retrieve valid operations for all condition fields instead of having a separate hack for recurring dates and amount inflow/outflow. This would make the code more maintainable and less error-prone.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could be done in a separate refactor, but right now there is no way for
getValidOps
to perform op-specific logic. The change would also need additional testing that I don't want to add to an already-large PR. But thanks for the suggestion! I made a note of it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jfdoming, I understand. Deferring this change to a separate refactor makes sense to keep this PR focused. Thank you for considering the suggestion.
(_/)
( ..)
(")(")