Skip to content

Conversation

@makermelissa
Copy link
Collaborator

Addressing #6

I also updated examples, comments, and error messages to reflect the change.

Copy link
Contributor

@dhalbert dhalbert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Some style changes and also check for < 0 on __getitem__ and __setitem__

adafruit_fram.py Outdated
" list, or tuple.")
if key > self._max_size:
if key >= self._max_size:
raise ValueError("Requested register '{0}' greater than maximum"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto

Copy link
Contributor

@jerryneedell jerryneedell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Tested on an I2C FRAM - len(fram) = 32768 -- yay!
Thank you!

@jerryneedell
Copy link
Contributor

of course Dan was far more thorough ... good suggestions.

@makermelissa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I went ahead and implemented your changes and fixed a bug that I found with address slicing that caused the last address to not be included.

Copy link
Contributor

@dhalbert dhalbert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good testing, finding the slice problem.

I noted some error messages that still said "register". It is up to you whether to change all the internal uses of "register" to "address" as well, for consistency. I think you could do a global search/replace and it would be fine (_read_register -> _read_adsress, etc.)

@makermelissa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

makermelissa commented Jan 25, 2019

Thanks. I went through and changed most of register to address except where it didn't make sense and tested again. Also I just did it manually because I don't trust the search/replace on mu.

@makermelissa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I just noticed I had used a < instead of <= check for the first address. That's now fixed.

Copy link
Contributor

@dhalbert dhalbert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! Thank you for fixing the original bugs and for your patience with my nitpicking! I think the code is more readable now.

@dhalbert dhalbert merged commit 7d8369f into adafruit:master Jan 26, 2019
adafruit-adabot added a commit to adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Bundle that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2019
Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_FRAM to 1.2.2 from 1.2.1:
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_FRAM#7 from melissagirl/master

Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_RA8875 to 1.0.1 from 1.0.0:
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_RA8875#2 from melissagirl/master

Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_BluefruitConnect to 1.0.5 from 1.0.3:
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_BluefruitConnect#6 from dhalbert/add-simpletest

Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Bundle/circuitpython_library_list.md to NA from NA:
  > Added the following libraries: Adafruit_CircuitPython_RA8875, Adafruit_CircuitPython_MIDI
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants