Skip to content

Update dependency org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-serialization-bom to v1.5.1 #85

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 12, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-serialization-bom 1.5.0 -> 1.5.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

Kotlin/kotlinx.serialization (org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-serialization-bom)

v1.5.1

==================
This release contains an important Native targets overhaul, as well as numerous enhancements and bugfixes.
Kotlin 1.8.21 is used by default.

New set of Native targets

The official Kotlin target support policy has recently been published
describing new target policy: each target belongs to a certain tier, and different tiers have different stability guarantees.
The official recommendation for library authors is to support targets up to Tier 3,
and kotlinx.serialization now follows it.
It means that in this release, there are a lot of new targets added from this tier,
such as androidNativeX86 or watchosDeviceArm64.
Note that since they belong to Tier 3, they're not auto-tested on CI.

kotlinx.serialization also ships some deprecated Kotlin/Native targets that do not belong to any tier (e.g. iosArm32, mingwX86).
We'll continue to release them, but we do not provide support for them, nor do we plan to add new targets from the deprecated list.

Improvements in Json elements

There are two new function sets that should make creating raw Json elements easier.
First one contains overloads for JsonPrimitive constructor-like function
that accept unsigned types: JsonPrimitive(1u).
Second one adds new addAll functions to JsonArrayBuilder to be used with collections
of numbers, booleans or strings: buildJsonArray { addAll(listOf(1, 2, 3)) }
Both were contributed to us by aSemy.

Other enhancements
  • Potential source-breaking change: Rename json-okio target variables to sink (#​2226)
  • Function to retrieve KSerializer by KClass and type arguments serializers (#​2291)
  • Added FormatLanguage annotation to Json methods (#​2234)
  • Properties Format: Support sealed/polymorphic classes as class properties (#​2255)
Bugfixes
  • KeyValueSerializer: Fix missing call to endStructure() (#​2272)
  • ObjectSerializer: Respect sequential decoding (#​2273)
  • Fix value class encoding in various corner cases (#​2242)
  • Fix incorrect json decoding iterator's .hasNext() behavior on array-wrapped inputs (#​2268)
  • Fix memory leak caused by invalid KTypeWrapper's equals method (#​2274)
  • Fixed NoSuchMethodError when parsing a JSON stream on Java 8 (#​2219)
  • Fix MissingFieldException duplication (#​2213)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 10am" in timezone Etc/UTC, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge July 12, 2023 16:17
@renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jul 12, 2023

Branch automerge failure

This PR was configured for branch automerge. However, this is not possible, so it has been raised as a PR instead.

@renovate renovate bot added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 12, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit bc8b01b Jul 12, 2023
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/kotlinx.serialization branch July 12, 2023 16:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants