Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade aegir from 37.12.1 to 40.0.4 #154

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

adamlaska
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • packages/ipfs-core-utils/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 631/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.2
Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
SNYK-JS-INFLIGHT-6095116
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: aegir The new version differs by 79 commits.

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

Copy link

New dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Packages Version New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
aegir 40.0.13 environment +283 492 MB npm-service-account-ipfs

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 12 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (8f351a8) 79.04% compared to head (1620044) 68.30%.
Report is 18 commits behind head on master.

Files Patch % Lines
packages/ipfs-http-client/src/dht/map-event.js 33.33% 4 Missing ⚠️
packages/ipfs-http-client/src/bootstrap/add.js 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
packages/ipfs-http-client/src/bootstrap/clear.js 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
packages/ipfs-http-client/src/bootstrap/list.js 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
packages/ipfs-http-client/src/bootstrap/reset.js 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
packages/ipfs-http-client/src/bootstrap/rm.js 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
packages/ipfs-http-client/src/swarm/addrs.js 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
packages/ipfs-http-client/src/swarm/local-addrs.js 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
packages/ipfs-http-client/src/swarm/peers.js 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #154       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   79.04%   68.30%   -10.74%     
===========================================
  Files         557      154      -403     
  Lines       36428     5358    -31070     
  Branches     2923      452     -2471     
===========================================
- Hits        28795     3660    -25135     
+ Misses       7633     1698     -5935     
Flag Coverage Δ
chrome 68.30% <58.62%> (-0.56%) ⬇️
node ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

google-cla bot commented Jan 18, 2024

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants