Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we create a QDState to avoid having to store Brax state descriptors in the info dictionary? #100

Open
felixchalumeau opened this issue Nov 1, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@felixchalumeau
Copy link
Collaborator

This question was raised by @Lookatator after the issue about the behavior descriptors we had a few months ago #12

At the moment, we haven't modified the core, we just updated the play step functions to avoid any problem and added a caveat section in the doc to warn the users. But we should still think about Luca's proposition in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant