Simplemma: a simple multilingual lemmatizer for Python

Purpose

Lemmatization is the process of grouping together the inflected forms of a word so they can be analysed as a single item, identified by the word's lemma, or dictionary form. Unlike stemming, lemmatization outputs word units that are still valid linguistic forms.

In modern natural language processing (NLP), this task is often indirectly tackled by more complex systems encompassing a whole processing pipeline. However, it appears that there is no straightforward way to address lemmatization in Python although this task can be crucial in fields such as information retrieval and NLP.

Simplemma provides a simple and multilingual approach to look for base forms or lemmata. It may not be as powerful as full-fledged solutions but it is generic, easy to install and straightforward to use. In particular, it does not need morphosyntactic information and can process a raw series of tokens or even a text with its built-in tokenizer. By design it should be reasonably fast and work in a large majority of cases, without being perfect.

With its comparatively small footprint it is especially useful when speed and simplicity matter, in low-resource contexts, for educational purposes, or as a baseline system for lemmatization and morphological analysis.

Currently, 49 languages are partly or fully supported (see table below).

Installation

The current library is written in pure Python with no dependencies: pip install simplemma

• pip3 where applicable
• pip install -U simplemma for updates
• pip install git+https://github.com/adbar/simplemma for the cutting-edge version

The last version supporting Python 3.6 and 3.7 is simplemma==1.0.0.

Usage

Word-by-word

Simplemma is used by selecting a language of interest and then applying the data on a list of words.

>>> import simplemma
# get a word
myword = 'masks'
# decide which language to use and apply it on a word form
>>> simplemma.lemmatize(myword, lang='en')
'mask'
# grab a list of tokens
>>> mytokens = ['Hier', 'sind', 'Vaccines']
>>> for token in mytokens:
>>>     simplemma.lemmatize(token, lang='de')
'hier'
'sein'
'Vaccines'
# list comprehensions can be faster
>>> [simplemma.lemmatize(t, lang='de') for t in mytokens]
['hier', 'sein', 'Vaccines']

Chaining languages

Chaining several languages can improve coverage, they are used in sequence:

>>> from simplemma import lemmatize
>>> lemmatize('Vaccines', lang=('de', 'en'))
'vaccine'
>>> lemmatize('spaghettis', lang='it')
'spaghettis'
>>> lemmatize('spaghettis', lang=('it', 'fr'))
'spaghetti'
>>> lemmatize('spaghetti', lang=('it', 'fr'))
'spaghetto'

Greedier decomposition

For certain languages a greedier decomposition is activated by default as it can be beneficial, mostly due to a certain capacity to address affixes in an unsupervised way. This can be triggered manually by setting the greedy parameter to True.

This option also triggers a stronger reduction through an additional iteration of the search algorithm, e.g. "angekündigten" → "angekündigt" (standard) → "ankündigen" (greedy). In some cases it may be closer to stemming than to lemmatization.

# same example as before, comes to this result in one step
>>> simplemma.lemmatize('spaghettis', lang=('it', 'fr'), greedy=True)
'spaghetto'
# German case described above
>>> simplemma.lemmatize('angekündigten', lang='de', greedy=True)
'ankündigen' # 2 steps: reduction to infinitive verb
>>> simplemma.lemmatize('angekündigten', lang='de', greedy=False)
'angekündigt' # 1 step: reduction to past participle

is_known()

The additional function is_known() checks if a given word is present in the language data:

>>> from simplemma import is_known
>>> is_known('spaghetti', lang='it')
True

Tokenization

A simple tokenization function is provided for convenience:

>>> from simplemma import simple_tokenizer
>>> simple_tokenizer('Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.')
['Lorem', 'ipsum', 'dolor', 'sit', 'amet', ',', 'consectetur', 'adipiscing', 'elit', ',', 'sed', 'do', 'eiusmod', 'tempor', 'incididunt', 'ut', 'labore', 'et', 'dolore', 'magna', 'aliqua', '.']
# use iterator instead
>>> simple_tokenizer('Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet', iterate=True)

The functions text_lemmatizer() and lemma_iterator() chain tokenization and lemmatization. They can take greedy (affecting lemmatization) and silent (affecting errors and logging) as arguments:

>>> from simplemma import text_lemmatizer
>>> sentence = 'Sou o intervalo entre o que desejo ser e os outros me fizeram.'
>>> text_lemmatizer(sentence, lang='pt')
# caveat: desejo is also a noun, should be desejar here
['ser', 'o', 'intervalo', 'entre', 'o', 'que', 'desejo', 'ser', 'e', 'o', 'outro', 'me', 'fazer', '.']
# same principle, returns a generator and not a list
>>> from simplemma import lemma_iterator
>>> lemma_iterator(sentence, lang='pt')

Caveats

# don't expect too much though
# this diminutive form isn't in the model data
>>> simplemma.lemmatize('spaghettini', lang='it')
'spaghettini' # should read 'spaghettino'
# the algorithm cannot choose between valid alternatives yet
>>> simplemma.lemmatize('son', lang='es')
'son' # valid common name, but what about the verb form?

As the focus lies on overall coverage, some short frequent words (typically: pronouns and conjunctions) may need post-processing, this generally concerns a few dozens of tokens per language.

The current absence of morphosyntactic information is an advantage in terms of simplicity. However, it is also an impassable frontier regarding lemmatization accuracy, for example when it comes to disambiguating between past participles and adjectives derived from verbs in Germanic and Romance languages. In most cases, simplemma often does not change such input words.

The greedy algorithm seldom produces invalid forms. It is designed to work best in the low-frequency range, notably for compound words and neologisms. Aggressive decomposition is only useful as a general approach in the case of morphologically-rich languages, where it can also act as a linguistically motivated stemmer.

Bug reports over the issues page are welcome.

Language detection

Language detection works by providing a text and tuple lang consisting of a series of languages of interest. Scores between 0 and 1 are returned.

The lang_detector() function returns a list of language codes along with their corresponding scores, appending "unk" for unknown or out-of-vocabulary words. The latter can also be calculated by using the function in_target_language() which returns a ratio.

# import necessary functions
>>> from simplemma import in_target_language, lang_detector
# language detection
>>> lang_detector('"Exoplaneta, též extrasolární planeta, je planeta obíhající kolem jiné hvězdy než kolem Slunce."', lang=("cs", "sk"))
[("cs", 0.75), ("sk", 0.125), ("unk", 0.25)]
# proportion of known words
>>> in_target_language("opera post physica posita (τὰ μετὰ τὰ φυσικά)", lang="la")
0.5

The greedy argument (extensive in past software versions) triggers use of the greedier decomposition algorithm described above, thus extending word coverage and recall of detection at the potential cost of a lesser accuracy.

Advanced usage via classes

The functions described above are suitable for simple usage, but you can have more control by instantiating Simplemma classes and calling their methods instead. Lemmatization is handled by the Lemmatizer class, while language detection is handled by the LanguageDetector class. These in turn rely on different lemmatization strategies, which are implementations of the LemmatizationStrategy protocol. The DefaultStrategy implementation uses a combination of different strategies, one of which is DictionaryLookupStrategy. It looks up tokens in a dictionary created by a DictionaryFactory.

For example, it is possible to conserve RAM by limiting the number of cached language dictionaries (default: 8) by creating a custom DefaultDictionaryFactory with a specific cache_max_size setting, creating a DefaultStrategy using that factory, and then creating a Lemmatizer and/or a LanguageDetector using that strategy:

# import necessary classes
>>> from simplemma import LanguageDetector, Lemmatizer
>>> from simplemma.strategies import DefaultStrategy
>>> from simplemma.strategies.dictionaries import DefaultDictionaryFactory

LANG_CACHE_SIZE = 5  # How many language dictionaries to keep in memory at once (max)
>>> dictionary_factory = DefaultDictionaryFactory(cache_max_size=LANG_CACHE_SIZE)
>>> lemmatization_strategy = DefaultStrategy(dictionary_factory=dictionary_factory)

# lemmatize using the above customized strategy
>>> lemmatizer = Lemmatizer(lemmatization_strategy=lemmatization_strategy)
>>> lemmatizer.lemmatize('doughnuts', lang='en')
'doughnut'

# detect languages using the above customized strategy
>>> language_detector = LanguageDetector('la', lemmatization_strategy=lemmatization_strategy)
>>> language_detector.proportion_in_target_languages("opera post physica posita (τὰ μετὰ τὰ φυσικά)")
0.5

For more information see the extended documentation.

Reducing memory usage

Simplemma provides an alternative solution for situations where low memory usage and fast initialization time are more important than lemmatization and language detection performance. This solution uses a DictionaryFactory that employs a trie as its underlying data structure, rather than a Python dict.

The TrieDictionaryFactory reduces memory usage by an average of 20x and initialization time by 100x, but this comes at the cost of potentially reducing performance by 50% or more, depending on the specific usage.

To use the TrieDictionaryFactory you have to install Simplemma with the marisa-trie extra dependency (available from version 1.1.0):

pip install simplemma[marisa-trie]

Then you have to create a custom strategy using the TrieDictionaryFactory and use that for Lemmatizer and LanguageDetector instances:

>>> from simplemma import LanguageDetector, Lemmatizer
>>> from simplemma.strategies import DefaultStrategy
>>> from simplemma.strategies.dictionaries import TrieDictionaryFactory

>>> lemmatization_strategy = DefaultStrategy(dictionary_factory=TrieDictionaryFactory())

>>> lemmatizer = Lemmatizer(lemmatization_strategy=lemmatization_strategy)
>>> lemmatizer.lemmatize('doughnuts', lang='en')
'doughnut'

>>> language_detector = LanguageDetector('la', lemmatization_strategy=lemmatization_strategy)
>>> language_detector.proportion_in_target_languages("opera post physica posita (τὰ μετὰ τὰ φυσικά)")
0.5

While memory usage and initialization time when using the TrieDictionaryFactory are significantly lower compared to the DefaultDictionaryFactory, that's only true if the trie dictionaries are available on disk. That's not the case when using the TrieDictionaryFactory for the first time, as Simplemma only ships the dictionaries as Python dicts. The trie dictionaries have to be generated once from the Python dicts. That happens on-the-fly when using the TrieDictionaryFactory for the first time for a language and will take a few seconds and use as much memory as loading the Python dicts for the language requires. For further invocations the trie dictionaries get cached on disk.

If the computer supposed to run Simplemma doesn't have enough memory to generate the trie dictionaries, they can also be generated on another computer with the same CPU architecture and copied over to the cache directory.

Supported languages

The following languages are available, identified by their BCP 47 language tag, which typically corresponds to the ISO 639-1 code. If no such code exists, a ISO 639-3 code is used instead.

Available languages (2022-01-20):

Code	Language	Forms (10³)	Acc.	Comments
ast	Asturian	124
bg	Bulgarian	204
ca	Catalan	579
cs	Czech	187	0.89	on UD CS-PDT
cy	Welsh	360
da	Danish	554	0.92	on UD DA-DDT, alternative: lemmy
de	German	675	0.95	on UD DE-GSD, see also German-NLP list
el	Greek	181	0.88	on UD EL-GDT
en	English	131	0.94	on UD EN-GUM, alternative: LemmInflect
enm	Middle English	38
es	Spanish	665	0.95	on UD ES-GSD
et	Estonian	119		low coverage
fa	Persian	12		experimental
fi	Finnish	3,199		see this benchmark
fr	French	217	0.94	on UD FR-GSD
ga	Irish	372
gd	Gaelic	48
gl	Galician	384
gv	Manx	62
hbs	Serbo-Croatian	656		Croatian and Serbian lists to be added later
hi	Hindi	58		experimental
hu	Hungarian	458
hy	Armenian	246
id	Indonesian	17	0.91	on UD ID-CSUI
is	Icelandic	174
it	Italian	333	0.93	on UD IT-ISDT
ka	Georgian	65
la	Latin	843
lb	Luxembourgish	305
lt	Lithuanian	247
lv	Latvian	164
mk	Macedonian	56
ms	Malay	14
nb	Norwegian (Bokmål)	617
nl	Dutch	250	0.92	on UD-NL-Alpino
nn	Norwegian (Nynorsk)	56
pl	Polish	3,211	0.91	on UD-PL-PDB
pt	Portuguese	924	0.92	on UD-PT-GSD
ro	Romanian	311
ru	Russian	595		alternative: pymorphy2
se	Northern Sámi	113
sk	Slovak	818	0.92	on UD SK-SNK
sl	Slovene	136
sq	Albanian	35
sv	Swedish	658		alternative: lemmy
sw	Swahili	10		experimental
tl	Tagalog	32		experimental
tr	Turkish	1,232	0.89	on UD-TR-Boun
uk	Ukrainian	370		alternative: pymorphy2

Languages marked as having low coverage may be better suited to language-specific libraries, but Simplemma can still provide limited functionality. Where possible, open-source Python alternatives are referenced.

Experimental mentions indicate that the language remains untested or that there could be issues with the underlying data or lemmatization process.

The scores are calculated on Universal Dependencies treebanks on single word tokens (including some contractions but not merged prepositions), they describe to what extent simplemma can accurately map tokens to their lemma form. See eval/ folder of the code repository for more information.

This library is particularly relevant as regards the lemmatization of less frequent words. Its performance in this case is only incidentally captured by the benchmark above. In some languages, a fixed number of words such as pronouns can be further mapped by hand to enhance performance.

Speed

The following orders of magnitude are provided for reference only and were measured on an old laptop to establish a lower bound:

• Tokenization: > 1 million tokens/sec
• Lemmatization: > 250,000 words/sec

Using the most recent Python version (i.e. with pyenv) can make the package run faster.

Roadmap

• Add further lemmatization lists
• Grammatical categories as option
• Function as a meta-package?
• Integrate optional, more complex models?

Credits and licenses

The software is licensed under the MIT license. For information on the licenses of the linguistic information databases, see the licenses folder.

The surface lookups (non-greedy mode) rely on lemmatization lists derived from the following sources, listed in order of relative importance:

• Lemmatization lists by Michal Měchura (Open Database License)
• Wiktionary entries packaged by the Kaikki project
• FreeLing project
• spaCy lookups data
• Unimorph Project
• Wikinflection corpus by Eleni Metheniti (CC BY 4.0 License)

Contributions

This package has been first created and published by Adrien Barbaresi. It has then benefited from extensive refactoring by Juanjo Diaz (especially the new classes). See the full list of contributors to the repository.

Feel free to contribute, notably by filing issues for feedback, bug reports, or links to further lemmatization lists, rules and tests.

Contributions by pull requests ought to follow the following conventions: code style with black, type hinting with mypy, included tests with pytest.

Other solutions

See lists: German-NLP and other awesome-NLP lists.

For another approach in Python see Spacy's edit tree lemmatizer.

References

To cite this software:

Barbaresi A. (year). Simplemma: a simple multilingual lemmatizer for Python [Computer software] (Version version number). Berlin, Germany: Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences. Available from https://github.com/adbar/simplemma DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4673264

This work draws from lexical analysis algorithms used in:

• Barbaresi, A., & Hein, K. (2017). Data-driven identification of German phrasal compounds. In International Conference on Text, Speech, and Dialogue Springer, pp. 192-200.
• Barbaresi, A. (2016). An unsupervised morphological criterion for discriminating similar languages. In 3rd Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects (VarDial 2016), Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 212-220.
• Barbaresi, A. (2016). Bootstrapped OCR error detection for a less-resourced language variant. In 13th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2016), pp. 21-26.