Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue/forms 16264: Unique instances of calendar element #1431

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

anshikag-adobe
Copy link
Contributor

Description

On creating multiple instances of date-time picker widget in a single form the same calendar element was being initialised to each unique instance of date-time picker hence fixed it to create unique instances of calendar element.

Related Issue

FORMS-16264

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes and the overall coverage did not decrease.
  • All unit tests pass on CircleCi.
  • I ran all tests locally and they pass.

@anshikag-adobe anshikag-adobe changed the title Issue/forms 16264 Issue/forms 16264: Unique instances of calendar element Oct 2, 2024
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 94 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

1 similar comment
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

1 similar comment
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 94 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 95 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

4 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 94 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.24%. Comparing base (a0b4060) to head (d902368).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                dev    #1431   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     82.24%   82.24%           
  Complexity      923      923           
=========================================
  Files           103      103           
  Lines          2366     2366           
  Branches        321      321           
=========================================
  Hits           1946     1946           
  Misses          257      257           
  Partials        163      163           
Flag Coverage Δ
?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@anshikag-adobe anshikag-adobe deleted the issue/FORMS-16264 branch October 3, 2024 09:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants