Migrate to GitHub Actions reusable workflows

[timkimadobe]

Description

This PR migrates the repo to use the reusable workflows (tag version: gha-android-3.3.0) from aepsdk-commons for:

• Update versions
  • Removal of local version scripts
• Release
• Snapshot
• Build and test
  • Migrating CircleCI -> GitHub Actions

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

• I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
• My code follows the code style of this project.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• All new and existing tests passed.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.33%. Comparing base (da55d63) to head (6a96aa1).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main      #47      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     85.23%   86.33%   +1.10%     
  Complexity      144      144              
============================================
  Files             6        6              
  Lines           616      651      +35     
  Branches         92       96       +4     
============================================
+ Hits            525      562      +37     
+ Misses           56       54       -2     
  Partials         35       35              

Flag	Coverage Δ
android-functional-tests	64.36% <ø> (?)
android-unit-tests	82.80% <ø> (?)
functional-tests	?
unit-tests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[kevinlind]

As the lint checks are more than just code formatting, there may be times when one needs to be run without the other. Could we not add checkformat as a dependency to lint and instead call each separately in CI? I think it would also make the CI scripts easier to understand in terms of what each step does.

[timkimadobe]

We did have them separately initially in the build-and-test workflow but Edge vs all the other extension repos use different commands, so I wanted to create a single unified lint command that the CI relies on and each repo can set up whichever lint related checks they want

• Unified lint command using ci-lint: Android custom build and test workflow artifact upload support aepsdk-commons#109

initially it had the ci- prefix but because the command wasn't necessarily CI exclusive, it was removed in favor of just make lint

• ci- prefix removal: Add template regex support for primary extension in version workflows aepsdk-commons#110

What do you think?