You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The file includes multiple reflectivity scans that do not have associated radial velocity
When multiple scans at same elevation are available, WSRLIB uses largest PRF sweep for radial velocity and spectrum with, and lowest PRF for reflectivity. I think a better approach would be to keep the reflectivity scan acquired simultaneously with reflectivity, so largest PRF sweep in all cases.
rscale attribute of the higher two scans that sets the range resolution is kept at 250 m instead of 500 m.
Certain older NEXRAD data has different range resolution for lowest three (250 m) and highest two (500 m) elevation scans, as well as different resolutions for different moments, e.g.
https://noaa-nexrad-level2.s3.amazonaws.com/2010/09/11/KBGM/KBGM20100911_012056_V03.gz:
rscale attribute of the higher two scans that sets the range resolution is kept at 250 m instead of 500 m.
See slack thread https://mlds-sheldon.slack.com/archives/DJJH17AHH/p1559065382000900?thread_ts=1559061983.000400&cid=DJJH17AHH
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: