Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use mergewith in additive_merge #36

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2024
Merged

Use mergewith in additive_merge #36

merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2024

Conversation

adrhill
Copy link
Owner

@adrhill adrhill commented May 3, 2024

Closes #35.

Temporary solution, should get replaced by #34.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.72%. Comparing base (8bc5c4e) to head (ecfde4d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #36      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.48%   70.72%   -0.76%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines         270      263       -7     
==========================================
- Hits          193      186       -7     
  Misses         77       77              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@adrhill adrhill merged commit 0b7fc7d into main May 3, 2024
2 checks passed
@adrhill adrhill deleted the ah/mergewith branch May 3, 2024 14:26
@gdalle gdalle mentioned this pull request May 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use mergewith for merging dicts of sets
2 participants