Skip to content

Conversation

@GeekMasher
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@GeekMasher GeekMasher requested a review from a team as a code owner September 12, 2025 14:16
@github-actions
Copy link

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Snapshot Warnings

⚠️: No snapshots were found for the head SHA 90b6d6b.
Ensure that dependencies are being submitted on PR branches and consider enabling retry-on-snapshot-warnings. See the documentation for more information and troubleshooting advice.

Scanned Files

None

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a new configurable input sarif-tool-name to control whether the SARIF file tool name gets rewritten with extractor information. The feature allows users to optionally disable SARIF tool name rewriting while maintaining backward compatibility with a default value of true.

  • Adds a new boolean input sarif-tool-name with default value true
  • Conditionally updates SARIF tool name based on the input configuration
  • Provides logging for both enabled and disabled scenarios

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
src/action.rs Adds the new sarif_tool_name input field and accessor method
src/main.rs Implements conditional SARIF tool name updating based on the new input
action.yml Defines the new input in the GitHub Action metadata

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

@GeekMasher GeekMasher merged commit 3c557a6 into main Sep 12, 2025
10 checks passed
@GeekMasher GeekMasher deleted the sarif-tool-rewrite branch September 12, 2025 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants