Skip to content

Field-level access-control bypass for multiselect field

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Oct 18, 2022 in keystonejs/keystone • Updated Jan 30, 2023

Package

npm @keystone-6/core (npm)

Affected versions

>= 2.2.0, < 2.3.1

Patched versions

2.3.1

Description

Impact

@keystone-6/core@2.2.0 || 2.3.0 users who are using the multiselect field, and provided field-level access control - are vulnerable to their field-level access control not being used.

List-level access control is NOT affected.

Field-level access control for fields other than multiselect are NOT affected.

Example, you are vulnerable if you are using field-level access control on a multiselect like the following:

const yourList = list({
  access: {
    // this is list-level access control, this is NOT impacted
  },
  fields: {
    yourFieldName: multiselect({
      // this is field-level access control, for multiselect fields
      //   this is vulnerable
      access: {
        create: ({ session }) => session?.data.isAdmin,
        update: ({ session }) => session?.data.isAdmin,
      },
      options: [
        { value: 'apples', label: 'Apples' },
        { value: 'oranges', label: 'Oranges' },
      ],
      // ...
    }),
    // ...
  },
  // ...
});

Mitigation

Please upgrade to @keystone-6/core >= 2.3.1, where this vulnerability has been closed.

Workarounds

If for some reason you cannot upgrade your dependencies, you should stop using the multiselect field.

Credits

Thanks to Marek R for reporting and submitting the pull request to fix this problem.

If you have any questions around this security advisory, please don't hesitate to contact us at security@keystonejs.com, or open an issue on GitHub.

If you have a security flaw to report for any software in this repository, please see our SECURITY policy.

References

@dcousens dcousens published to keystonejs/keystone Oct 18, 2022
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Oct 18, 2022
Reviewed Oct 18, 2022
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Oct 25, 2022
Last updated Jan 30, 2023

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

0.242%
(65th percentile)

CVE ID

CVE-2022-39322

GHSA ID

GHSA-6mhr-52mv-6v6f

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.