Skip to content

Division by 0 in `FractionalAvgPool`

Low severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 13, 2021 in tensorflow/tensorflow • Updated Feb 1, 2023

Package

pip tensorflow (pip)

Affected versions

< 2.1.4
>= 2.2.0, < 2.2.3
>= 2.3.0, < 2.3.3
>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.2

Patched versions

2.1.4
2.2.3
2.3.3
2.4.2
pip tensorflow-cpu (pip)
< 2.1.4
>= 2.2.0, < 2.2.3
>= 2.3.0, < 2.3.3
>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.2
2.1.4
2.2.3
2.3.3
2.4.2
pip tensorflow-gpu (pip)
< 2.1.4
>= 2.2.0, < 2.2.3
>= 2.3.0, < 2.3.3
>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.2
2.1.4
2.2.3
2.3.3
2.4.2

Description

Impact

An attacker can cause a runtime division by zero error and denial of service in tf.raw_ops.FractionalAvgPool:

import tensorflow as tf

value = tf.constant([60], shape=[1, 1, 1, 1], dtype=tf.int32)
pooling_ratio = [1.0, 1.0000014345305555, 1.0, 1.0]
pseudo_random = False
overlapping = False
deterministic = False
seed = 0
seed2 = 0

tf.raw_ops.FractionalAvgPool(
  value=value, pooling_ratio=pooling_ratio, pseudo_random=pseudo_random,
  overlapping=overlapping, deterministic=deterministic, seed=seed, seed2=seed2)

This is because the implementation computes a divisor quantity by dividing two user controlled values:

for (int i = 0; i < tensor_in_and_out_dims; ++i) {
  output_size[i] = static_cast<int>(std::floor(input_size[i] / pooling_ratio_[i]));
  DCHECK_GT(output_size[i], 0); 
} 

The user controls the values of input_size[i] and pooling_ratio_[i] (via the value.shape() and pooling_ratio arguments). If the value in input_size[i] is smaller than the pooling_ratio_[i], then the floor operation results in output_size[i] being 0. The DCHECK_GT line is a no-op outside of debug mode, so in released versions of TF this does not trigger.

Later, these computed values are used as arguments to GeneratePoolingSequence. There, the first computation is a division in a modulo operation:

std::vector<int64> GeneratePoolingSequence(int input_length, int output_length,
                                           GuardedPhiloxRandom* generator,
                                           bool pseudo_random) {
  ...
  if (input_length % output_length == 0) {
    diff = std::vector<int64>(output_length, input_length / output_length);
  }
  ...
}

Since output_length can be 0, this results in runtime crashing.

Patches

We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 548b5eaf23685d86f722233d8fbc21d0a4aecb96.

The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

For more information

Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.

Attribution

This vulnerability has been reported by Ying Wang and Yakun Zhang of Baidu X-Team.

References

@mihaimaruseac mihaimaruseac published to tensorflow/tensorflow May 13, 2021
Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 14, 2021
Reviewed May 18, 2021
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 21, 2021
Last updated Feb 1, 2023

Severity

Low

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

EPSS score

0.044%
(14th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2021-29550

GHSA ID

GHSA-f78g-q7r4-9wcv

Source code

No known source code
Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.