Skip to content

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been...

Moderate severity Unreviewed Published May 1, 2024 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Dec 23, 2024

Package

No package listedSuggest a package

Affected versions

Unknown

Patched versions

Unknown

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

NFS: Fix nfs_netfs_issue_read() xarray locking for writeback interrupt

The loop inside nfs_netfs_issue_read() currently does not disable
interrupts while iterating through pages in the xarray to submit
for NFS read. This is not safe though since after taking xa_lock,
another page in the mapping could be processed for writeback inside
an interrupt, and deadlock can occur. The fix is simple and clean
if we use xa_for_each_range(), which handles the iteration with RCU
while reducing code complexity.

The problem is easily reproduced with the following test:
mount -o vers=3,fsc 127.0.0.1:/export /mnt/nfs
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/nfs/file1.bin bs=4096 count=1
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
dd if=/mnt/nfs/file1.bin of=/dev/null
umount /mnt/nfs

On the console with a lockdep-enabled kernel a message similar to
the following will be seen:

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
6.7.0-lockdbg+ #10 Not tainted

inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
test5/1708 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
ffff888127baa598 (&xa->xa_lock#4){+.?.}-{3:3}, at:
nfs_netfs_issue_read+0x1b2/0x4b0 [nfs]
{IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
lock_acquire+0x144/0x380
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4e/0xa0
__folio_end_writeback+0x17e/0x5c0
folio_end_writeback+0x93/0x1b0
iomap_finish_ioend+0xeb/0x6a0
blk_update_request+0x204/0x7f0
blk_mq_end_request+0x30/0x1c0
blk_complete_reqs+0x7e/0xa0
__do_softirq+0x113/0x544
__irq_exit_rcu+0xfe/0x120
irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20
sysvec_call_function_single+0x6f/0x90
asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x1a/0x20
pv_native_safe_halt+0xf/0x20
default_idle+0x9/0x20
default_idle_call+0x67/0xa0
do_idle+0x2b5/0x300
cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x40
start_secondary+0x19d/0x1c0
secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x18f/0x19b
irq event stamp: 176891
hardirqs last enabled at (176891): []
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60
hardirqs last disabled at (176890): []
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x79/0xa0
softirqs last enabled at (176646): []
__irq_exit_rcu+0xfe/0x120
softirqs last disabled at (176633): []
__irq_exit_rcu+0xfe/0x120

other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

    CPU0
    ----

lock(&xa->xa_lock#4);

lock(&xa->xa_lock#4);

*** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by test5/1708:
#0: ffff888127baa498 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#22){++++}-{4:4}, at:
nfs_start_io_read+0x28/0x90 [nfs]
#1: ffff888127baa650 (mapping.invalidate_lock#3){.+.+}-{4:4}, at:
page_cache_ra_unbounded+0xa4/0x280

stack backtrace:
CPU: 6 PID: 1708 Comm: test5 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.7.0-lockdbg+
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39
04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x90
mark_lock+0xb3f/0xd20
__lock_acquire+0x77b/0x3360
_raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x80
nfs_netfs_issue_read+0x1b2/0x4b0 [nfs]
netfs_begin_read+0x77f/0x980 [netfs]
nfs_netfs_readahead+0x45/0x60 [nfs]
nfs_readahead+0x323/0x5a0 [nfs]
read_pages+0xf3/0x5c0
page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x1c8/0x280
filemap_get_pages+0x38c/0xae0
filemap_read+0x206/0x5e0
nfs_file_read+0xb7/0x140 [nfs]
vfs_read+0x2a9/0x460
ksys_read+0xb7/0x140

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 1, 2024
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 1, 2024
Last updated Dec 23, 2024

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

0.042%
(5th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2024-27031

GHSA ID

GHSA-p8xq-m5g2-cvrc

Source code

No known source code

Dependabot alerts are not supported on this advisory because it does not have a package from a supported ecosystem with an affected and fixed version.

Learn more about GitHub language support

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.