Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Update check_n_jobs #14

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 14, 2023
Merged

[BUG] Update check_n_jobs #14

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 14, 2023

Conversation

MatthewMiddlehurst
Copy link
Member

Updates check_n_jobs docs. Fixes output for negative n_jobs. 0 input return 1.

Location of the functions seems a bit weird, but left it for now.

Copy link
Contributor

@patrickzib patrickzib left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe consider too large negative numbers, too

@TonyBagnall
Copy link
Contributor

If negative I'd probably just return 1?

@TonyBagnall
Copy link
Contributor

Ah does -x generally mean use this number fewer than max as a convention, as in it's not a misuse?

@MatthewMiddlehurst
Copy link
Member Author

Copy link
Contributor

@patrickzib patrickzib left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All looks fine now.

@MatthewMiddlehurst MatthewMiddlehurst added bugfix bug Something isn't working and removed bugfix labels Feb 7, 2023
@MatthewMiddlehurst
Copy link
Member Author

Waiting on CI. better safe than sorry.

@TonyBagnall TonyBagnall merged commit 66435c2 into main Feb 14, 2023
@TonyBagnall TonyBagnall deleted the check_n_jobs branch February 14, 2023 12:39
aiwalter added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2023
* [GOV] Revert CoC to remove FK changes (#17)

* Revert CoC to remove FK changes

* Removed FK name from COC

* Removed FK name from COC

* Removed NumFOCUS as second CoCC

* Remove NumFOCUS

* Removed NumFOCUS

* Removed NumFOCUS

* [GOV] Removed 7 days discussion period before votings. Removed weekend rule by adding 2 days instead (#41)

* Removed 7 days discussion time for CC and CoC votes

* Removed 7 days discussion time for CC and CoC votes

* Removed 7 days discussion time for CC and CoC votes

* Removed 7 days discussion time for CC and CoC votes

* Removed 7 days discussion time for CC and CoC votes

* Removed 7 days discussion time for CC and CoC votes

* Removed 7 days discussion time for CC and CoC votes

* Removed 21 days and chanfed back to 14 days

* [GOV] CC and CoC term limitation to 2 years (#22)

* [FORK] Update README (IN PROGRESS) (#43)

* simple readme name replace

* manual changes

* disclaimer

* readme split

* [GOV] Updated team page (#19)

* Updated team page

* previous devs

* missed one

---------

Co-authored-by: Matthew Middlehurst <m.middlehurst@uea.ac.uk>

* [FORK] Revert #15 "Remove workflow files" (MERGE WHEN REPO PUBLIC) (#16)

* temporarily stop this action

* comment out all github workflows

* revert

* remove workflows

* add workflows

* uncommented

* license update (#56)

* [BUG] Update check_n_jobs (#14)

* check_n_jobs

* check_n_jobs

* min 1 thread

* Added CoCC members (#57)

* [ENH] Dictionary Classifiers (#58)

Maintenance of Dictionary Classifiers
- Reverts alphabet_size=4 for BOSS and WEASEL,
- carries out deprecation of cBOSS
- adds dilation to SFAFast
- Tidies up Doc-Strings

* remove shellcheck (#60)

* add disclaimer (#64)

---------

Co-authored-by: Matthew Middlehurst <pfm15hbu@uea.ac.uk>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Middlehurst <m.middlehurst@uea.ac.uk>
Co-authored-by: Patrick Schäfer <patrick.schaefer@hu-berlin.de>
Co-authored-by: Lukasz Mentel <lmmentel@users.noreply.github.com>
aadya940 added a commit to aadya940/aeon that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants