[ENH] Tidy up test exclusions

[TonyBagnall]

This PR tidies up some of the exclusions in testing/_config.py and updates some of the issues

1. Removes exclusions I dont think we need any more. Many referenced issues in the bad place which have since been closed. If they cause intermittent failure, I would like to see the fails, raise an issue and re-exclude again.
2. Removes a redundant function from RISE
3. Changes PlateauFinder to not store the intervals it uses
4. Reduces TapNet testing size
5. Reorders some of the classifier tests in anticipation of simplification (sorry)

I have reduced the scope of this to remove just the exclusion for PlateauFinder and HIVECOTEV2, I think maybe incermentally bring others back to give time for intermittent fault finding

Reference Issues/PRs

#472 #347 #271

[TonyBagnall]

@hadifawaz1999 I think this is just a random DL fail, I can see no reason for it failing, but could you take a look and see if there is anything
https://github.com/aeon-toolkit/aeon/actions/runs/5186055397/jobs/9346945374?pr=473

[hadifawaz1999]

@hadifawaz1999 I think this is just a random DL fail, I can see no reason for it failing, but could you take a look and see if there is anything
https://github.com/aeon-toolkit/aeon/actions/runs/5186055397/jobs/9346945374?pr=473

Hmm thats super weird it shouldn't do that, are you running it locally or just on CI ? will try the test multiple times locally today, will let you know what happens.

[TonyBagnall]

This is from the CI, I think its a form of interference from saving on CI, but I can honestly not see how the network would be uninitialised

[TonyBagnall]

more limited un-exclusion:

1. passes
2. passes
3. passes
4. passes
5. passes
6. passes
7. FAIL https://github.com/aeon-toolkit/aeon/actions/runs/5213205431/jobs/9506946636?pr=473
8. passes
9. passes
10. passes

[hadifawaz1999]

This is from the CI, I think its a form of interference from saving on CI, but I can honestly not see how the network would be uninitialised

The CI saving model is now fixed in #485

[MatthewMiddlehurst]

I don't think the latest failure (https://github.com/aeon-toolkit/aeon/actions/runs/5360306587/jobs/9734338503?pr=473) is on our end, so i would disregard it. Seems like its not only us codecov/codecov-action#1003.

The PR doesnt actually change the removed estimators list, so not sure why failure #7 happened! I have a hunch some of the DL ones are memory hungry and could be reduced, but thats just speculation

[TonyBagnall]

now I have actually removed the exclusion, this has since ran four times without fail and is I think ready to go in

[hadifawaz1999]

Do we have some clue about the other ones still excluded such as HC1 ? @TonyBagnall

[TonyBagnall]

@hadifawaz1999 I'm waiting for @MatthewMiddlehurst 's big revamp of the tree ensembles before going there

[hadifawaz1999]

LGTM!