feat: Display all testnet tokens

[janmichek]

Description

resolves #732

Demo

Checklist:

• I have read and followed the Contributing Guide
• disable listed tokens for testnet
• add N/A labels

[github-actions]

Deployed to https://pr-739-aescan.stg.service.aepps.com and https://pr-739-aescan-testnet.stg.service.aepps.com

[janmichek]

as folowup I created this #742

[Liubov-crypto]

I think there is an issue, total supply is missing for some tokens:

2024-04-25.1.12.11.mov

I can't see holders, probably some issues with backend:

[janmichek]

@Liubov-crypto all fixed, thanks for testing

[Liubov-crypto]

I have a question: is total supply and Amount of the tokens held by its owner shouldn't be the same?
https://github.com/aeternity/aescan/assets/69896204/f5f977a9-79fd-416e-bff7-a75ce9402873

if the one account is holding all amount of tokens, then percentage field should be 100%?

2024-04-30.3.19.57.mov

for example I can see Percentage on mainnet:

2024-04-30.3.24.15.mov

[Liubov-crypto]

@janmichek please check it

[michele-franchi]

I have a question: is total supply and Amount of the tokens held by its owner shouldn't be the same? https://github.com/aeternity/aescan/assets/69896204/f5f977a9-79fd-416e-bff7-a75ce9402873

if the one account is holding all amount of tokens, then percentage field should be 100%?

2024-04-30.3.19.57.mov
for example I can see Percentage on mainnet:

2024-04-30.3.24.15.mov

@janmichek did you already fix this issue?

[janmichek]

I have a question: is total supply and Amount of the tokens held by its owner shouldn't be the same? https://github.com/aeternity/aescan/assets/69896204/f5f977a9-79fd-416e-bff7-a75ce9402873
if the one account is holding all amount of tokens, then percentage field should be 100%?
2024-04-30.3.19.57.mov
for example I can see Percentage on mainnet:
2024-04-30.3.24.15.mov

@janmichek did you already fix this issue?

Nope, there is some delicate bug :D it appears on PR preview, but works on localhost.

[janmichek]

Can we continue on the review here? #783 I could not make it right here