Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency @testing-library/jest-dom to v6 #601

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@testing-library/jest-dom ^5.16.5 -> ^6.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

testing-library/jest-dom (@​testing-library/jest-dom)

v6.4.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • Remove errant export of GetByRoleMatcher, fixing type checking in some TS configurations (#​575) (a93c0c4)

v6.4.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • Export type TestingLibraryMatchers from "./matchers" (#​576) (dd1c4dd)

v6.4.0

Compare Source

Features

v6.3.0

Compare Source

Features

v6.2.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • Standalone types for "./matchers" export and add Bun support (#​566) (5675b86)

v6.2.0

Compare Source

Features
  • toHaveAccessibleDescription supports aria-description (#​565) (1fb156c)

v6.1.6

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.1.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.1.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • upgrade @adobe/css-tools to 4.3.1 to address vulnerability (#​532) (44f1eab)

v6.1.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.1.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.1.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.1.0

Compare Source

Features

v6.0.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • matchers type is making the global expect unsafe (#​513) (bdb34f1)

v6.0.0

Compare Source

Features
BREAKING CHANGES
  • Removes the extend-expect script. Users should use
    the default import path or one of the new test platform-specific
    paths to automatically extend the appropriate "expect" instance.

extend-expect was not documented in the Readme, so this change should
have minimal impact.

Users can now use the following import paths to automatically extend
"expect" for their chosen test platform:

For example:

import '@​testing-library/jest-dom/jest-globals'

Importing from one of the above paths will augment the appropriate
matcher interface for the given test platform, assuming the import
is done in a .ts file that is included in the user's tsconfig.json.

It's also (still) possible to import the matchers directly without
side effects:

import * as matchers from '@​testing-library/jest-dom/matchers'

  • Update kcd-scripts
  • Drop node < 14

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@corwinkuiper corwinkuiper enabled auto-merge April 4, 2024 22:29
@corwinkuiper corwinkuiper added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 4, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch Apr 4, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/testing-library-jest-dom-6.x branch from 75b18f5 to 247d46f Compare April 4, 2024 22:46
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/testing-library-jest-dom-6.x branch from 247d46f to 2877ea2 Compare April 4, 2024 22:47
@corwinkuiper corwinkuiper enabled auto-merge April 4, 2024 22:47
@corwinkuiper corwinkuiper added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 4, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 549c90b Apr 4, 2024
4 checks passed
@corwinkuiper corwinkuiper deleted the renovate/testing-library-jest-dom-6.x branch April 4, 2024 23:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant