-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Zariski coverage on CommRing^op #1082
Conversation
(with Max Zeuner)
…ical into ZariskiSite
module AU = A.UniversalProp | ||
module BU = B.UniversalProp | ||
|
||
ψ : (i : Fin (um .n)) → CommRingHom A.R[1/ um .f i ]AsCommRing B.R[1/ φ $r um .f i ]AsCommRing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately, --lossy-unification
is needed to both show that ψ
has the above type and fills the goal where it's used. I tried to play around with opaque
, but to no avail.
Any ideas anyone?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the solution should be to make the operation R[1/_]AsCommRing
opaque. But I don't have the energy to actually carry that out, it is used in too many places.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR is ready to be merged.
module AU = A.UniversalProp | ||
module BU = B.UniversalProp | ||
|
||
ψ : (i : Fin (um .n)) → CommRingHom A.R[1/ um .f i ]AsCommRing B.R[1/ φ $r um .f i ]AsCommRing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the solution should be to make the operation R[1/_]AsCommRing
opaque. But I don't have the energy to actually carry that out, it is used in too many places.
Finishing the draft PR (#1081) with @MatthiasHu.