Skip to content

Refactor Trainer.train to async function#164

Merged
yanxi-chen merged 4 commits intoagentscope-ai:mainfrom
chenyushuo:dev/sync_update
Aug 5, 2025
Merged

Refactor Trainer.train to async function#164
yanxi-chen merged 4 commits intoagentscope-ai:mainfrom
chenyushuo:dev/sync_update

Conversation

@chenyushuo
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

  1. Refactor Trainer.train to async function.
  2. Modify lifetime for synchronizer for bug fix

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has passed all tests
  • Docstrings have been added/updated in Google Style
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Code is ready for review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @chenyushuo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily refactors the Trainer.train function to be asynchronous, enabling more efficient and non-blocking operations within the training loop. This change propagates through the system, making various data sampling and reading components asynchronous as well. Additionally, it includes a bug fix by adjusting the lifetime management of the Synchronizer actor, ensuring proper resource handling in different operational modes.

Highlights

  • Asynchronous Trainer Refactor: The core Trainer.train method has been refactored to an async function, enabling more efficient and non-blocking operations within the training loop. This change allows for concurrent execution of training steps and synchronization checks.
  • Asynchronous Data Handling: The SampleStrategy implementations and BufferReader interfaces now support asynchronous data reading (read_async). This new asynchronous capability is utilized by both the Trainer and Explorer components for improved data pipeline efficiency.
  • Synchronizer Lifetime Management: The Synchronizer actor's lifetime is now conditionally set to detached based on the configuration mode (explore or specific train algorithms). This modification addresses a bug related to the synchronizer's lifecycle and ensures proper resource handling in different operational scenarios.
  • Enhanced Synchronization Logic: Updates to the Synchronizer and Trainer's sync_weight logic, including new last_sync_step tracking in Trainer, ensure more robust and timely model weight synchronization across distributed components.
  • Explorer Async Adaptations: The Explorer component has been updated to await previously synchronous eval and data read operations, aligning its behavior with the new asynchronous patterns introduced in the Trainer and data readers.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the Trainer.train function to be asynchronous, improving weight synchronization. I've identified areas for improvement in handling blocking I/O operations within async methods in buffer readers and suggested enhancing the readability of a complex condition in the synchronizer.

@chenyushuo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-all

@chenyushuo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-module-common

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
29 29 0 0 0 0 817ms

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_all_examples_are_valid 2ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_continue_from_checkpoint_is_valid 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_load_default_config 4ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestEID::test_eid_properties 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_action_mask_and_logprobs_type 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_assertions 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_dpo_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_gather 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_multi_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_serialize_deserialize 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_single_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_to_dict 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_dpo_experience_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_experience_model_experience_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_multiturn_experience_batch_converstion 1ms
tests/common/synchronizer_test.py::TestStateDictBasedSynchronizer_0::test_synchronizer 87ms
tests/common/synchronizer_test.py::TestStateDictBasedSynchronizer_1::test_synchronizer 83ms
tests/common/synchronizer_test.py::TestStateDictBasedSynchronizer_2::test_synchronizer 128ms
tests/common/synchronizer_test.py::TestStateDictBasedSynchronizer_3::test_synchronizer 123ms
tests/common/synchronizer_test.py::TestNCCLBasedSynchronizer_0::test_synchronizer 60ms
tests/common/synchronizer_test.py::TestNCCLBasedSynchronizer_1::test_synchronizer 61ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_0::test_generate 39ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_1::test_generate 49ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_2::test_generate 51ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_3::test_generate 38ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_4::test_generate 51ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServer::test_api 29ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_assistant_token_mask 1ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@yanxi-chen yanxi-chen merged commit 7d66626 into agentscope-ai:main Aug 5, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants