Skip to content

Add step-wise workflow test#173

Merged
pan-x-c merged 3 commits intoagentscope-ai:mainfrom
hiyuchang:feat/multi_step_workflow_test
Aug 8, 2025
Merged

Add step-wise workflow test#173
pan-x-c merged 3 commits intoagentscope-ai:mainfrom
hiyuchang:feat/multi_step_workflow_test

Conversation

@hiyuchang
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

As the title says.

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has passed all tests
  • Docstrings have been added/updated in Google Style
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Code is ready for review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @hiyuchang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've added a new test file to validate the functionality of the step-wise workflow modules, specifically StepWiseRewardWorkflow and RewardPropagationWorkflow. This ensures these workflows behave as expected under various conditions, including correct step progression, reward calculation, and adherence to maximum environment steps.

Highlights

  • New Test File: I've introduced tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py to provide comprehensive testing for the step_wise_workflow components.
  • Workflow Validation: The new tests cover the core logic of StepWiseRewardWorkflow and RewardPropagationWorkflow, verifying their step execution, reward assignment, and termination conditions.
  • Error Handling Test: I've included tests to confirm that workflows correctly raise assertions when model.enable_history is disabled, ensuring proper setup is enforced.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a new test file for step-wise workflows. The tests cover the basic functionality of StepWiseRewardWorkflow and RewardPropagationWorkflow, including reward calculation, stopping conditions, and error handling. The test implementation is mostly good, but I have a few suggestions to improve correctness and maintainability. Specifically, there's a minor bug in a mock response string due to an unescaped backslash, and a couple of test methods could be split for better clarity and test isolation.

@hiyuchang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-module-explorer

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 8, 2025

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
27 27 0 0 0 0 256ms

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::BaseExplorerCase::test_explorer 1ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerCountdownEval::test_explorer 55ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerCountdownNoEval::test_explorer 61ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerWithAddStrategy::test_explorer 40ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_concurrent_operations 4ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_get_results 20ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_multi_step_execution 5ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_non_repeatable_workflow 4ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_scheduler_all_methods 14ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_scheduler_restart_after_stop 8ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_split_tasks 7ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_stepwise_experience_eid 5ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_wait_all 7ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_wait_all_timeout_with_multi_batch 13ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_reward_propagation_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_step_wise_reward_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflows_raise_error 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflows_stop_at_max_env_steps 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_gsm8k_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_boxed_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_complex_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_eval_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_fraction_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_rm_gallery_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_repeatable 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_resettable 1ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@pan-x-c pan-x-c merged commit abca3fe into agentscope-ai:main Aug 8, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants