Skip to content

Fix custom_fields in experiences#191

Merged
garyzhang99 merged 3 commits intoagentscope-ai:mainfrom
pan-x-c:fix/experience_custom_field
Aug 15, 2025
Merged

Fix custom_fields in experiences#191
garyzhang99 merged 3 commits intoagentscope-ai:mainfrom
pan-x-c:fix/experience_custom_field

Conversation

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Collaborator

@pan-x-c pan-x-c commented Aug 15, 2025

Description

As the title says

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has passed all tests
  • Docstrings have been added/updated in Google Style
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Code is ready for review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @pan-x-c, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses the handling of custom_fields within the Experiences data structure. It modifies the Experiences dataclass to allow for mutable instances, which is essential for dynamically adding custom fields. A new test case has been added to validate the correct gathering of experiences that include custom fields, ensuring that these fields are properly batched and accessible.

Highlights

  • Experiences dataclass modification: The Experiences dataclass in trinity/common/experience.py has been updated by removing the frozen=True attribute. This change allows instances of Experiences to be mutable, which is necessary for dynamically adding and managing custom fields.
  • New test for custom fields: A new test method, test_gather_experiences_with_custom_fields, has been added to tests/common/experience_test.py. This test verifies the functionality of Experiences.gather_experiences when custom fields are provided, ensuring that these fields are correctly batched and accessible within the Experiences object.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pan-x-c commented Aug 15, 2025

/unittest-common

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces support for custom fields in Experiences objects. This is achieved by making the Experiences dataclass mutable and dynamically adding attributes to it. A new test case is added to verify this functionality. My main feedback concerns the design choice of making Experiences mutable, which could have side effects, and I also suggest improving the test coverage for the new feature to handle edge cases.

Copy link
Collaborator

@garyzhang99 garyzhang99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions
Copy link

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
94 94 0 0 0 0 1.5s

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/algorithm/add_strategy_test.py::TestAddStrategy::test_correct_bias_strategy 1ms
tests/algorithm/add_strategy_test.py::TestAddStrategy::test_duplicate_add_strategy 1ms
tests/algorithm/add_strategy_test.py::TestAddStrategy::test_grpo_args 1ms
tests/algorithm/add_strategy_test.py::TestAddStrategy::test_reward_variance_strategy 1ms
tests/algorithm/add_strategy_test.py::TestAddStrategy::test_step_wise_grpo_strategy 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_dpo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_gspo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_mix_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_opmd_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_ppo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_sft_policy_loss 1ms
tests/buffer/file_test.py::TestFileBuffer::test_file_buffer 3ms
tests/buffer/file_test.py::TestFileBuffer::test_file_reader 1ms
tests/buffer/file_test.py::TestFileBuffer::test_file_writer 1ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_priority_queue_buffer_reuse 6ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_priority_queue_capacity 3ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_queue_buffer_0_queue 3ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_queue_buffer_1_priority_queue 3ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_queue_buffer_capacity 4ms
tests/buffer/sql_test.py::TestSQLBuffer::test_create_sql_buffer 4ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_all_examples_are_valid 2ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_config_flatten 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_continue_from_checkpoint_is_valid 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_load_default_config 4ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestEID::test_eid_properties 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_action_mask_and_logprobs_type 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_assertions 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_dpo_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_gather 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_multi_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_serialize_deserialize 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_single_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_to_dict 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_dpo_experience_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_experience_model_experience_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_gather_experiences_with_custom_fields 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_multiturn_experience_batch_converstion 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_0::test_generate 35ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_1::test_generate 53ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_2::test_generate 47ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_3::test_generate 35ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_4::test_generate 45ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServer::test_api 24ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_assistant_token_mask 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_0_deepseek_r1::test_api_tool_calls 22ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_1::test_api_tool_calls 19ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::BaseExplorerCase::test_explorer 1ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerCountdownEval::test_explorer 45ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerCountdownNoEval::test_explorer 55ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerWithAddStrategy::test_explorer 35ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_concurrent_operations 4ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_get_results 19ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_multi_step_execution 4ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_non_repeatable_workflow 4ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_scheduler_all_methods 14ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_scheduler_restart_after_stop 7ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_split_tasks 7ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_stepwise_experience_eid 4ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_wait_all 7ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_wait_all_timeout_with_multi_batch 13ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_reward_propagation_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_step_wise_reward_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflows_raise_error 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflows_stop_at_max_env_steps 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_gsm8k_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_boxed_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_complex_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_eval_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_fraction_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_rm_gallery_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_repeatable 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_resettable 1ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestSynchronizerExit::test_synchronizer 28ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestStateDictBasedSynchronizer_0::test_synchronizer 60ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestStateDictBasedSynchronizer_1::test_synchronizer 65ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestStateDictBasedSynchronizer_2::test_synchronizer 81ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestStateDictBasedSynchronizer_3::test_synchronizer 97ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestNCCLBasedSynchronizer_0::test_synchronizer 49ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestNCCLBasedSynchronizer_1::test_synchronizer 51ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::BaseTrainerCase::test_trainer 1ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerCountdown::test_trainer 134ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestStepAheadAsyncRL::test_trainer 47ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerGSM8K::test_trainer 45ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerSFTWarmupGSM8K::test_trainer 50ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerDPO::test_trainer 31ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerSFT::test_trainer 30ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestFullyAsyncMode::test_fully_async_mode_0_queue 59ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestFullyAsyncMode::test_fully_async_mode_1_priority_queue 65ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestMathEvalUtils::test_extract_answer 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestMathEvalUtils::test_verify_math_answer 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestEvalUtils::test_is_equiv 1ms
tests/utils/plugin_test.py::TestPluginLoader::test_load_plugins 4ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@garyzhang99 garyzhang99 merged commit bc824ae into agentscope-ai:main Aug 15, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments