Skip to content

Remove AddStrategy#211

Merged
pan-x-c merged 3 commits intoagentscope-ai:mainfrom
pan-x-c:feature/clean_stale_module
Aug 21, 2025
Merged

Remove AddStrategy#211
pan-x-c merged 3 commits intoagentscope-ai:mainfrom
pan-x-c:feature/clean_stale_module

Conversation

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Collaborator

@pan-x-c pan-x-c commented Aug 21, 2025

Description

Experience pipeline replaces the original AddStrategy module.
Remove the stale code here.

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has passed all tests
  • Docstrings have been added/updated in Google Style
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Code is ready for review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @pan-x-c, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on a significant code cleanup by removing the AddStrategy module. This module has been superseded by a new 'experience pipeline,' making its functionality redundant. The changes involve deleting all files related to AddStrategy and updating relevant documentation to reflect these structural changes and maintain accurate references.

Highlights

  • Module Removal: The AddStrategy module, along with all its associated classes and implementations (e.g., GRPOAddStrategy, OPMDAddStrategy, RewardVarianceAddStrategy, CorrectBiasAddStrategy, DuplicateInformativeAddStrategy, StepWiseGRPOStrategy), has been completely removed from the codebase.
  • Documentation Updates: Documentation files were updated to reflect changes in module structure and to incorporate new Sphinx cross-references, ensuring that the documentation remains accurate and navigable after the code removal.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively removes the AddStrategy module, which has been superseded by the ExperiencePipeline. This is a valuable refactoring that simplifies the architecture by moving logic like advantage calculation into more appropriate components like AdvantageFn. The file deletions are clean, and the accompanying documentation updates correctly reflect the new module paths and add helpful cross-references. The changes are well-implemented and improve the overall codebase.

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pan-x-c commented Aug 21, 2025

/unittest-all

@github-actions
Copy link

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
106 106 0 0 0 0 1.9s

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_duplicate_grpo 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_correct_bias 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_reward_std 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_step_wise_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_dpo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_gspo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_mix_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_opmd_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_ppo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_sft_policy_loss 1ms
tests/buffer/experience_pipeline_test.py::TestExperiencePipeline::test_experience_pipeline 11ms
tests/buffer/file_test.py::TestFileBuffer::test_file_buffer 2ms
tests/buffer/file_test.py::TestFileBuffer::test_file_reader 1ms
tests/buffer/file_test.py::TestFileBuffer::test_file_writer 2ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_priority_queue_buffer_reuse 7ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_priority_queue_capacity 3ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_queue_buffer_0_queue 4ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_queue_buffer_1_priority_queue 4ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_queue_buffer_capacity 5ms
tests/buffer/reward_shaping_mapper_test.py::TestRewardShapingMapper::test_basic_usage 1ms
tests/buffer/sql_test.py::TestSQLBuffer::test_create_sql_buffer 4ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_all_examples_are_valid 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_config_flatten 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_continue_from_checkpoint_is_valid 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_load_default_config 10ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestEID::test_eid_properties 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_action_mask_and_logprobs_type 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_assertions 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_dpo_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_gather 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_hf_datasets_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_multi_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_serialize_deserialize 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_single_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_to_dict 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_dpo_experience_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_experience_model_experience_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_gather_experiences_with_custom_fields 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_multiturn_experience_batch_converstion 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_0::test_generate 37ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_1::test_generate 17ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_2::test_generate 17ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_3::test_generate 53ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_4::test_generate 48ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_5::test_generate 36ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_6::test_generate 45ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServer::test_api 24ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_assistant_token_mask 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_0_deepseek_r1::test_api_tool_calls 21ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_1::test_api_tool_calls 19ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::BaseExplorerCase::test_explorer 1ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerCountdownEval::test_explorer 54ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerCountdownNoEval::test_explorer 57ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerGSM8k::test_explorer 200ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_concurrent_operations 4ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_get_results 19ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_multi_step_execution 4ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_non_repeatable_workflow 4ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_scheduler_all_methods 14ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_scheduler_restart_after_stop 7ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_split_tasks 7ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_stepwise_experience_eid 4ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_wait_all 7ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_wait_all_timeout_with_multi_batch 13ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_reward_propagation_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_step_wise_reward_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflows_raise_error 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflows_stop_at_max_env_steps 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_gsm8k_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_boxed_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_complex_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_eval_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_fraction_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_rm_gallery_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_repeatable 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_resettable 1ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestSynchronizerExit::test_synchronizer 28ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestStateDictBasedSynchronizer_0::test_synchronizer 60ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestStateDictBasedSynchronizer_1::test_synchronizer 65ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestStateDictBasedSynchronizer_2::test_synchronizer 87ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestStateDictBasedSynchronizer_3::test_synchronizer 75ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestNCCLBasedSynchronizer_0::test_synchronizer 52ms
tests/manager/synchronizer_test.py::TestNCCLBasedSynchronizer_1::test_synchronizer 52ms
tests/service/data_juicer_test.py::TestDataJuicer::test_config 1ms
tests/service/data_juicer_test.py::TestDataJuicer::test_server_start 21ms
tests/service/data_juicer_test.py::TestDataJuicerExperiencePipeline::test_data_juicer_operators 21ms
tests/service/data_juicer_test.py::TestDataJuicerTaskPipeline::test_data_juicer_task_pipeline 14ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerCountdown::test_trainer 142ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestStepAheadAsyncRL::test_trainer 52ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerGSM8K_0_fsdp::test_trainer 44ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerGSM8K_1_fsdp2::test_trainer 47ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerSFTWarmupGSM8K::test_trainer 52ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerDPO::test_trainer 32ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerSFT::test_trainer 30ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestFullyAsyncMode::test_fully_async_mode_0_queue 66ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestFullyAsyncMode::test_fully_async_mode_1_priority_queue 62ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerMIX::test_trainer 59ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestMathEvalUtils::test_extract_answer 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestMathEvalUtils::test_verify_math_answer 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestEvalUtils::test_is_equiv 1ms
tests/utils/plugin_test.py::TestPluginLoader::test_load_plugins_local 1ms
tests/utils/plugin_test.py::TestPluginLoader::test_load_plugins_remote 5ms
tests/utils/plugin_test.py::TestPluginLoader::test_passing_custom_class 3ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@pan-x-c pan-x-c merged commit d15f4f5 into agentscope-ai:main Aug 21, 2025
2 checks passed
yaochaorui pushed a commit to yaochaorui/Trinity-RFT that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants