Skip to content

Conversation

@ishandhanani
Copy link
Contributor

@ishandhanani ishandhanani commented Aug 2, 2025

Overview:

Details:

Where should the reviewer start?

Related Issues: (use one of the action keywords Closes / Fixes / Resolves / Relates to)

  • closes GitHub issue: #xxx

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the README by removing outdated notes about placeholder engine metrics and related references.

@copy-pr-bot
Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Aug 2, 2025

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@ishandhanani ishandhanani requested a review from athreesh August 2, 2025 03:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs label Aug 2, 2025
@ishandhanani ishandhanani enabled auto-merge (squash) August 2, 2025 03:20
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 2, 2025

Walkthrough

A note in the "Aggregated Serving with KV Routing" section of the components/backends/sglang/README.md was removed. This note previously explained the use of placeholder engine metrics and referenced future updates and related pull requests. No other changes or content modifications were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
README Documentation Update
components/backends/sglang/README.md
Removed note about placeholder engine metrics, references to future PRs, and TODOs in the README.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A note once nestled in README's lines,
About placeholder metrics and future signs,
Has hopped away, no longer to stay—
The docs are cleaner, the path is clear,
As rabbits cheer with a README cheer!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c86052c and 8470834.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/backends/sglang/README.md (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • components/backends/sglang/README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: pre-merge-rust (lib/runtime/examples)
  • GitHub Check: pre-merge-rust (lib/bindings/python)
  • GitHub Check: pre-merge-rust (.)
  • GitHub Check: Build and Test - vllm

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/S and removed size/XS labels Aug 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@athreesh athreesh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. thx for being on top of updating documentation for SGL

@ishandhanani ishandhanani merged commit e5fa8b6 into main Aug 3, 2025
10 checks passed
@ishandhanani ishandhanani deleted the ishan/small branch August 3, 2025 00:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants