-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade to dotnet core 2.1 #4
Conversation
Some of the tests seem flaky and fail due to concurrency issues with file IO access. This happened on master too. Refactoring the tests to use randomized files or in memory packages to avoid this should be considered. |
Thanks. I haven't seen those issues, but this is possible. LiGet implementation of V2 is ported from old NuGet server, It can have issues. |
Cool! Wasn't aware of BaGet. |
Which dockerfile are you talking about? |
The BaGet one. It uses the stretch image. I couldn't readily find information on it, but appears to have the sdk included in it, which isn't required at runtime. What is the benefit of that image over the runtime containers? |
Ah, I see, you meant |
I need this PR to build, I dont know if the dependent pre-release packages went away or something.
|
Yes, they were probably removed. |
What's the BaGet migration? Are you replacing Liget with BaGet, obsoleting this project? |
@Mizipzor I already have a BaGet fork which is a drop-in replacement for LiGet. |
No description provided.