-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 208
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hashing of nodes #119
Comments
Original comment by Andrea Cepellotti (Bitbucket: acepellotti, GitHub: cepellotti): Moreover, to be sure that results are the same, we should make sure that the code and the parsers are not changed. For the code, we should introduce probably an md5sum, and we should also somehow check whether the parser has changed or not. |
Original comment by Andrea Cepellotti (Bitbucket: acepellotti, GitHub: cepellotti): As noted by Andrius: |
…at replaces the _dbnode member if a similar node already exists
…hash, which obviously should not be checked in the DB
Originally reported by: Andrea Cepellotti (Bitbucket: acepellotti, GitHub: cepellotti)
Implement a node hashing. In this way, it would be possible to immediately recognise whether a node has been already stored in the DB, or if a calculation has been run already, which would return a result immediately.
Note also, this would massively speed up the debugging of workflows (repeating many times the same things): we might immediately understand (create a method for it) whether a wf step has calculations to be executed or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: