-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docs: Fix typo's in "Internal Architecture - Repositories" section #4886
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Keen eyes ;)
Can we use this PR to also potentially change the reordering of the sections? At least I remember now that during the reviewing of the original new repo PR @giovannipizzi suggested that we change the sections and don't start with the historical perspective, but instead just explain how the current repo system works. Then after that we can give the insight in the legacy design. I'd be ok with this if others think this is also better. Would be good to include those changes in this PR then and revise the entire section since it hasn't really been reviewed yet. |
Indeed - now moving forward to the next release, it's better to start with the "current status", and then only at the end (if/when appropriate) give a historical perspective, maybe even linked in a different page if not crucial to be read by new users. I let you decide if you can do it directly in this PR (if you can't, please open an issue so we don't forget, but great if you can) |
Note that this is the "Internal Architecture" which is not intended for new users, but developers and maybe interested advanced users. |
If we fix the ordering in this one, we could even close #4036 with this PR which would be good |
Thanks a lot @mbercx . This is looking good to me. If you fix the warning in the docs build:
then we can merge this. Sorry for slipping you the additional work during this PR ;) |
I know, I saw it. 🙃 Couldn't build the docs on my macBook because I just upgraded to Big Sur and apparently I had to update Xcode, which takes a gazillion years. 🙄 Now building on my work station to make sure I don't have any more warnings.
Haha, no worries, I'm used to your tricks. 😏 |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #4886 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 80.01% 80.01% -0.00%
===========================================
Files 516 516
Lines 36573 36573
===========================================
- Hits 29261 29260 -1
- Misses 7312 7313 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Appreciate the accepted scope creep 👍
Fixes #4036
Here we fix some typos in the "Internal Architecture - Repositories"
section, as well as restructure the page so the current repository design is
presented first. The original design is still explained at the end of the section
since it can offer some insight into the motivation behind the current design.