Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update pytest to 3.0.7 #30

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2017
Merged

Conversation

pyup-bot
Copy link
Contributor

There's a new version of pytest available.
You are currently using 3.0.6. I have updated it to 3.0.7

These links might come in handy: PyPI | Changelog | Homepage

Changelog

3.0.7

==================

  • Fix issue in assertion rewriting breaking due to modules silently discarding
    other modules when importing fails
    Notably, importing the anydbm module is fixed. (2248).
    Thanks pfhayes
    for the PR.
  • junitxml: Fix problematic case where system-out tag occured twice per testcase
    element in the XML report. Thanks kkoukiou_ for the PR.
  • Fix regression, pytest now skips unittest correctly if run with --pdb
    (2137). Thanks to gst for the report and mbyt_ for the PR.
  • Ignore exceptions raised from descriptors (e.g. properties) during Python test collection (2234).
    Thanks to bluetech
    .

  • --override-ini now correctly overrides some fundamental options like python_files (2238).
    Thanks sirex
    for the report and nicoddemus_ for the PR.

  • Replace raise StopIteration usages in the code by simple returns to finish generators, in accordance to PEP-479_ (2160).
    Thanks tgoodlet
    for the report and nicoddemus_ for the PR.

  • Fix internal errors when an unprintable AssertionError is raised inside a test.
    Thanks omerhadari_ for the PR.

  • Skipping plugin now also works with test items generated by custom collectors (2231).
    Thanks to vidartf
    .
  • Fix trailing whitespace in console output if no .ini file presented (2281). Thanks fbjorn for the PR.
  • Conditionless xfail markers no longer rely on the underlying test item
    being an instance of PyobjMixin, and can therefore apply to tests not
    collected by the built-in python test collector. Thanks barneygale_ for the
    PR.

.. _pfhayes: https://github.com/pfhayes
.. _bluetech: https://github.com/bluetech
.. _gst: https://github.com/gst
.. _sirex: https://github.com/sirex
.. _vidartf: https://github.com/vidartf
.. _kkoukiou: https://github.com/KKoukiou
.. _omerhadari: https://github.com/omerhadari
.. _fbjorn: https://github.com/fbjorn

.. _2248: pytest-dev/pytest#2248
.. _2137: pytest-dev/pytest#2137
.. _2160: pytest-dev/pytest#2160
.. _2231: pytest-dev/pytest#2231
.. _2234: pytest-dev/pytest#2234
.. _2238: pytest-dev/pytest#2238
.. _2281: pytest-dev/pytest#2281

.. _PEP-479: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0479/

Got merge conflicts? Close this PR and delete the branch. I'll create a new PR for you.

Happy merging! 🤖

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 14, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #30 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #30   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.67%   97.67%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines          86       86           
  Branches       13       13           
=======================================
  Hits           84       84           
  Misses          1        1           
  Partials        1        1

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 200c968...9aafb35. Read the comment docs.

@ticosax ticosax merged commit 92fd080 into master Mar 15, 2017
@ticosax ticosax deleted the pyup-update-pytest-3.0.6-to-3.0.7 branch March 15, 2017 11:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants