Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move metadata to pyproject.toml #9951

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cdce8p
Copy link
Contributor

@cdce8p cdce8p commented Nov 17, 2024

What do these changes do?

The metadata changes:

 Metadata-Version: 2.1
 Name: aiohttp
 Version: 4.0.0a2.dev0
 Summary: Async http client/server framework (asyncio)
-Maintainer: aiohttp team <team@aiohttp.org>
-Maintainer-email: team@aiohttp.org
+Maintainer-email: aiohttp team <team@aiohttp.org>
 License: Apache-2.0
-Home-page: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp
+Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp
 Project-URL: Chat: Matrix, https://matrix.to/#/#aio-libs:matrix.org
 Project-URL: Chat: Matrix Space, https://matrix.to/#/#aio-libs-space:matrix.org
 Project-URL: CI: GitHub Actions, https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/actions?query=workflow%3ACI
 Project-URL: Coverage: codecov, https://codecov.io/github/aio-libs/aiohttp
 Project-URL: Docs: Changelog, https://docs.aiohttp.org/en/stable/changes.html
 Project-URL: Docs: RTD, https://docs.aiohttp.org
 Project-URL: GitHub: issues, https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues
 Project-URL: GitHub: repo, https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp
 Classifier: Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable
 Classifier: Framework :: AsyncIO
 Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
 Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: Apache Software License
 Classifier: Operating System :: POSIX
 Classifier: Operating System :: MacOS :: MacOS X
 Classifier: Operating System :: Microsoft :: Windows
 Classifier: Programming Language :: Python
 Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
 Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.9
 Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.10
 Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11
 Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12
 Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.13
 Classifier: Topic :: Internet :: WWW/HTTP
 Requires-Python: >=3.9
 Description-Content-Type: text/x-rst
 License-File: LICENSE.txt
 Requires-Dist: aiohappyeyeballs >=2.3.0
 Requires-Dist: aiosignal >=1.1.2
 Requires-Dist: frozenlist >=1.1.1
 Requires-Dist: multidict <7.0,>=4.5
 Requires-Dist: propcache >=0.2.0
 Requires-Dist: yarl <2.0,>=1.17.0
 Requires-Dist: async-timeout <6.0,>=4.0 ; python_version < "3.11"
 Provides-Extra: speedups
 Requires-Dist: brotlicffi ; (platform_python_implementation != "CPython") and extra == 'speedups'
 Requires-Dist: Brotli ; (platform_python_implementation == "CPython") and extra == 'speedups'
 Requires-Dist: aiodns >=3.2.0 ; (sys_platform == "linux" or sys_platform == "darwin") and extra == 'speedups'

 ...

Open questions

  • Should this PR be backported? It's possible, might just require some manual work due to merge conflicts.

@psf-chronographer psf-chronographer bot added the bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR label Nov 17, 2024
@cdce8p cdce8p requested a review from bdraco November 17, 2024 22:59
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.73%. Comparing base (4c3b1c6) to head (51bb1d2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #9951   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.73%   98.73%           
=======================================
  Files         121      121           
  Lines       36728    36728           
  Branches     4384     4384           
=======================================
  Hits        36262    36262           
  Misses        314      314           
  Partials      152      152           
Flag Coverage Δ
CI-GHA 98.61% <ø> (ø)
OS-Linux 98.30% <ø> (ø)
OS-Windows 96.13% <ø> (ø)
OS-macOS 97.39% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.10.11 97.24% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.10.15 97.84% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️
Py-3.11.10 97.84% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.11.9 97.29% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.12.7 98.37% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.13.0 98.35% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
Py-3.9.13 97.17% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.9.20 97.71% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
Py-pypy7.3.16 97.32% <ø> (ø)
VM-macos 97.39% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
VM-ubuntu 98.30% <ø> (ø)
VM-windows 96.13% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 17, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #9951 will not alter performance

Comparing cdce8p:move-metadata (51bb1d2) with master (4c3b1c6)

Summary

✅ 43 untouched benchmarks

@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

Let's not rush this. Keeping a dedicated config is a conscious choice. Also, PRs must not reformat half a project along with changing the packaging configs.

FWIW I'd rather keep it as is for now. Especially, since I was going to sync the configs across the projects and this is going to cause a lot of headache since it conflicts with how things are now.

I'm 👎 on this migration right now. It'd be interesting to gather the current dependency limitations in the downstreams to make an informed choice. Additionally, the move would have to happen in the dependencies first.

@cdce8p
Copy link
Contributor Author

cdce8p commented Nov 17, 2024

Let's not rush this. Keeping a dedicated config is a conscious choice. Also, PRs must not reformat half a project along with changing the packaging configs.

That's actually a bug with the current black config. Since it can't detect the lowest supported version, it assumes py33 and doesn't use the correct style. In f718fa1 I've pinned the lowest version which doesn't cause any reformatting.

FWIW I'd rather keep it as is for now. Especially, since I was going to sync the configs across the projects and this is going to cause a lot of headache since it conflicts with how things are now.

I'm 👎 on this migration right now. It'd be interesting to gather the current dependency limitations in the downstreams to make an informed choice. Additionally, the move would have to happen in the dependencies first.

I'm probably missing something here. This PR doesn't affect any downstream projects. The project metadata change is minimal and spec compliant.

Tbh I just thought it might be a good time to move the static metadata after I learned that it can work fine with setup.py. It will probably still take a while (couple of years) but I expect setuptools to eventually deprecate the setup.cfg config.

There is no strict need to do that now, so if you're opposed feel free to close the PR.

Copy link
Member

@asvetlov asvetlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I personally don't care where the project metadata sits until it works and I personally shouldn't spend additional time on the infrastructure maintenance.

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member

That's actually a bug with the current black config.

@cdce8p could you please extract a fix for this particular problem into a separate PR? A small patch has a great chance to be reviewed and approved quickly.

@asvetlov asvetlov closed this Nov 18, 2024
@asvetlov asvetlov reopened this Nov 18, 2024
@asvetlov
Copy link
Member

Ooh, sorry. I've pushed the wrong button and closed the PR. Please accept my apologizes.

@cdce8p
Copy link
Contributor Author

cdce8p commented Nov 18, 2024

That's actually a bug with the current black config.

@cdce8p could you please extract a fix for this particular problem into a separate PR? A small patch has a great chance to be reviewed and approved quickly.

@asvetlov See #9962. It looks bigger than it actually is.

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member

Thanks, @cdce8p
The PR is merged and back ported

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants