Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Libressl #537

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Support Libressl #537

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

catap
Copy link

@catap catap commented Jul 8, 2024

Here a small changes which allows to build and run aioquick against LibreSSL

@jlaine
Copy link
Contributor

jlaine commented Jul 21, 2024

FYI we are considering dropping the C code here in PR #457

@catap
Copy link
Author

catap commented Jul 22, 2024

@jlaine well, I've used this patch to make OpenBSD port anyway and I think that better to backport to upstream patches.

@@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ async def test_connect_and_serve_with_ed25519_certificate(self):
)
)

@skipIf("ed448" in SKIP_TESTS, "Skipping ed448 tests")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where is this used?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I don't understand your question. Can I ask you to rephase it?

@@ -584,9 +584,12 @@ def test_handshake_with_ed25519_certificate(self):
)

def test_handshake_with_ed448_certificate(self):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not use the same skipIf("ed448" in SKIP_TESTS) as above?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed it make things cleaner

@catap
Copy link
Author

catap commented Aug 18, 2024

@jlaine and ping here as well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants