Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: Add ruff lint rules #19

Open
wants to merge 18 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

aaronsteers
Copy link
Contributor

@aaronsteers aaronsteers commented Nov 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced dependency management and linting configurations for improved code quality.
    • Updated linting rules and formatting options to ensure consistency across the project.
    • Maintained compatibility with CI processes by specifying supported Python versions.

@aaronsteers aaronsteers changed the title Aj/chore/add ruff lint rules Chore: Add ruff lint rules Nov 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 10, 2024

Important

Review skipped

More than 25% of the files skipped due to max files limit. The review is being skipped to prevent a low-quality review.

96 files out of 300 files are above the max files limit of 75. Please upgrade to Pro plan to get higher limits.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request primarily focus on enhancing dependency management and linting configurations within the pyproject.toml file. Key updates include the expansion of the tool.ruff section to incorporate new linting rules, configurations for various code quality tools, and adjustments to formatting options. The tool.poe.tasks and tool.airbyte_ci sections remain largely unchanged, with the latter ensuring compatibility with CI processes.

Changes

File Change Summary
pyproject.toml Expanded tool.ruff for new linting rules and configurations; updated formatting options; maintained tool.poe.tasks and tool.airbyte_ci sections.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant CI
    participant Linter
    participant Formatter

    Developer->>Linter: Run linting checks
    Linter->>Developer: Provide linting results
    Developer->>Formatter: Format code
    Formatter->>Developer: Return formatted code
    Developer->>CI: Submit code for CI
    CI->>Linter: Run linting in CI
    CI->>Formatter: Format code in CI
Loading

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, changes bloom bright,
With linting and formatting, all feels just right.
Ruff's rules now in place, complexity tamed,
A hop and a skip, our project is famed!
Dependencies managed, tasks neatly aligned,
A rabbit's delight, in code we unwind! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pyproject.toml (2)

167-205: Consider enabling some ignored rules in the future

While the ignore list is well-documented, consider enabling these rules in the future for better code maintainability:

  • D102/D103: Missing docstrings in public methods/functions
  • E501: Line length limits
  • TD003: Issue links for TODOs

These rules can significantly improve code documentation and readability.


106-255: Overall solid Ruff configuration with room for documentation

The Ruff configuration is comprehensive and well-structured, with good coverage of important linting rules. To improve maintainability:

  1. Document the rationale for:
    • Using preview mode
    • Relaxed complexity limits
    • Ignored documentation rules
  2. Consider creating a linting guide in the documentation to help developers understand and work with these rules effectively.

Would you like me to help create a linting guide document that explains these configurations?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 734d778 and 9e5bdb1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
pyproject.toml (4)

112-166: Well-structured and comprehensive rule selection

The selected rules provide excellent coverage across multiple aspects of code quality, including type safety, performance, and best practices. The selection aligns well with Python best practices and modern development standards.


206-212: Good safety considerations in fix configurations

The fixable/unfixable configuration shows good judgment by preventing automatic removal of commented code and print statements, which could lead to loss of important information or debugging capabilities.


213-255: Document rationale for relaxed complexity limits

The following limits have been relaxed significantly from their defaults:

  • max-complexity = 24 (default is usually 10)
  • max-args = 8 (default is 5)

Consider adding comments in the configuration or documentation to explain these decisions, as they could impact code maintainability.

#!/bin/bash
# Check if these limits are documented
rg -i "complexity|max.?args" README.md docs/ || echo "No documentation found about complexity limits"

106-111: Consider the implications of enabling preview mode

The preview = true setting enables experimental features in Ruff that may introduce breaking changes in future updates. Consider setting this to false for more stable linting behavior, or document this decision in the codebase.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the chore label Nov 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant