Resolve ❌ destinations in connector dependency workflow

[evantahler]

Just like #19451, we've got a number of destinations that currently have problems in the connector dependency workflow. A good list to work from is here: #19993 (comment).

Of note, the strict-encrypt connectors should not be in the seeds, so we should adjust the python code to know this.

[erohmensing]

I think that may be why they are ⚠️ and not ❌ , but I'd be down to check that extra and for it to be ✅ (not in seed) (expected)

[evantahler]

We could make a new status emoji, like 🔵 for "not there, but expected"