Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify BigQuery Destination Setup #7846

Closed
nataliekwong opened this issue Nov 11, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #9573
Closed

Simplify BigQuery Destination Setup #7846

nataliekwong opened this issue Nov 11, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #9573

Comments

@nataliekwong
Copy link
Contributor

Tell us about the problem you're trying to solve

We ask for a few inputs with the BigQuery destination that users aren't used to selecting. We can make it clearer what the impact of selecting these options will be for the user.

Describe the solution you’d like

Transformation Query Run Type: this is not typically asked of the user. The current help text does not make it intuitive to what the selection will change. A user said “it seems like from this help text, there’s no harm in choosing batch... Right?”
Google BigQuery client chunk size this is also not typically asked of the user. The label and description is wordy - it would help to simplify what this actually means. The link to the external site has no mention of "chunk size", so it's not easy for the user to understand how to find more information about it on this page. No one explicitly got tripped up here because it was just left to the default value.

@nataliekwong nataliekwong added type/enhancement New feature or request area/connectors Connector related issues UX labels Nov 11, 2021
@sherifnada sherifnada moved this to Prioritized for Scoping in GL Roadmap Dec 17, 2021
@alexandr-shegeda alexandr-shegeda moved this from Prioritized for scoping to Ready for implementation in GL Roadmap Dec 23, 2021
@yurii-bidiuk yurii-bidiuk moved this from Ready for implementation to Implementation in progress in GL Roadmap Jan 11, 2022
@yurii-bidiuk yurii-bidiuk moved this from Implementation in progress to Internal review in GL Roadmap Jan 18, 2022
@yurii-bidiuk yurii-bidiuk moved this from Internal review to Done in GL Roadmap Jan 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants