-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert a change made to enhance snowflake test stability as it broke … #21494
Conversation
/test connector=connectors/source-snowflake
Build PassedTest summary info:
|
/test connector=connectors/source-postgres
Build PassedTest summary info:
|
/test connector=connectors/source-mysql
Build PassedTest summary info:
|
/test connector=connectors/source-mssql
Build PassedTest summary info:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do the snowflake tests pass?
Affected Connector ReportNOTE
|
Connector | Version | Changelog | Publish |
---|---|---|---|
source-alloydb |
1.0.34 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-alloydb-strict-encrypt |
1.0.34 |
🔵 (ignored) |
🔵 (ignored) |
source-bigquery |
0.2.3 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-clickhouse |
0.1.14 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-clickhouse-strict-encrypt |
0.1.14 |
🔵 (ignored) |
🔵 (ignored) |
source-cockroachdb |
0.1.18 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-cockroachdb-strict-encrypt |
0.1.18 |
🔵 (ignored) |
🔵 (ignored) |
source-db2 |
0.1.16 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-db2-strict-encrypt |
0.1.16 |
🔵 (ignored) |
🔵 (ignored) |
source-dynamodb |
0.1.0 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-e2e-test |
2.1.3 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-e2e-test-cloud |
2.1.1 |
🔵 (ignored) |
🔵 (ignored) |
source-elasticsearch |
0.1.1 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-jdbc |
0.3.5 |
🔵 (ignored) |
🔵 (ignored) |
source-kafka |
0.2.3 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-mongodb-strict-encrypt |
0.1.19 |
🔵 (ignored) |
🔵 (ignored) |
source-mongodb-v2 |
0.1.19 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-mssql |
0.4.26 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-mssql-strict-encrypt |
0.4.26 |
🔵 (ignored) |
🔵 (ignored) |
source-mysql |
1.0.18 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-mysql-strict-encrypt |
1.0.18 |
🔵 (ignored) |
🔵 (ignored) |
source-oracle |
0.3.21 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-oracle-strict-encrypt |
0.3.21 |
🔵 (ignored) |
🔵 (ignored) |
source-postgres |
1.0.36 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-postgres-strict-encrypt |
1.0.36 |
🔵 (ignored) |
🔵 (ignored) |
source-redshift |
0.3.15 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-scaffold-java-jdbc |
0.1.0 |
🔵 (ignored) |
🔵 (ignored) |
source-sftp |
0.1.2 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-snowflake |
0.1.28 |
✅ | ✅ |
source-tidb |
0.2.1 |
✅ | ✅ |
- See "Actionable Items" below for how to resolve warnings and errors.
✅ Destinations (0)
Connector | Version | Changelog | Publish |
---|
- See "Actionable Items" below for how to resolve warnings and errors.
✅ Other Modules (0)
Actionable Items
(click to expand)
Category | Status | Actionable Item |
---|---|---|
Version | ❌ mismatch |
The version of the connector is different from its normal variant. Please bump the version of the connector. |
⚠ doc not found |
The connector does not seem to have a documentation file. This can be normal (e.g. basic connector like source-jdbc is not published or documented). Please double-check to make sure that it is not a bug. |
|
Changelog | ⚠ doc not found |
The connector does not seem to have a documentation file. This can be normal (e.g. basic connector like source-jdbc is not published or documented). Please double-check to make sure that it is not a bug. |
❌ changelog missing |
There is no chnagelog for the current version of the connector. If you are the author of the current version, please add a changelog. | |
Publish | ⚠ not in seed |
The connector is not in the seed file (e.g. source_definitions.yaml ), so its publication status cannot be checked. This can be normal (e.g. some connectors are cloud-specific, and only listed in the cloud seed file). Please double-check to make sure that it is not a bug. |
❌ diff seed version |
The connector exists in the seed file, but the latest version is not listed there. This usually means that the latest version is not published. Please use the /publish command to publish the latest version. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving on integration tests passing
It should pass. The reverted change made it more resilient to garbage data left over on our test instance. |
What
A previous change for snowflake broke postgres, mysql and mssql integration tests.
Undo change.