Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Source Typeform: fixed expected records for stream forms #21641

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2023

Conversation

darynaishchenko
Copy link
Collaborator

fixed expected records for stream forms

@darynaishchenko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

darynaishchenko commented Jan 20, 2023

/test connector=connectors/source-typeform

🕑 connectors/source-typeform https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/3966679232
✅ connectors/source-typeform https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/3966679232
Python tests coverage:

Name                          Stmts   Miss  Cover
-------------------------------------------------
source_typeform/__init__.py       2      0   100%
source_typeform/source.py       143     34    76%
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                           145     34    77%
Name                          Stmts   Miss  Cover
-------------------------------------------------
source_typeform/__init__.py       2      0   100%
source_typeform/source.py       143      7    95%
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                           145      7    95%
	 Name                                                 Stmts   Miss  Cover   Missing
	 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	 source_acceptance_test/base.py                          12      4    67%   16-19
	 source_acceptance_test/config.py                       141      5    96%   87, 93, 239, 243-244
	 source_acceptance_test/conftest.py                     211     95    55%   36, 42-44, 49, 54, 77, 83, 89-91, 110, 115-117, 123-125, 131-132, 137-138, 143, 149, 158-167, 173-178, 193, 217, 248, 254, 262-267, 275-285, 293-306, 311-317, 324-335, 342-358
	 source_acceptance_test/plugin.py                        69     25    64%   22-23, 31, 36, 120-140, 144-148
	 source_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py              402    115    71%   53, 58, 93-104, 109-116, 120-121, 125-126, 308, 346-363, 376-387, 391-396, 402, 435-440, 478-485, 528-530, 533, 598-606, 618-621, 626, 682-683, 689, 692, 728-738, 751-776
	 source_acceptance_test/tests/test_incremental.py       160     14    91%   58-65, 70-83, 246
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/asserts.py                 39      2    95%   62-63
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/common.py                  94     10    89%   16-17, 32-38, 72, 75
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/compare.py                 62     23    63%   21-51, 68, 97-99
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/connector_runner.py       133     33    75%   24-27, 46-47, 50-54, 57-58, 73-75, 78-80, 83-85, 88-90, 93-95, 124-125, 159-161, 208
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/json_schema_helper.py     107     13    88%   30-31, 38, 41, 65-68, 96, 120, 192-194
	 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	 TOTAL                                                 1609    339    79%

Build Passed

Test summary info:

=========================== short test summary info ============================
SKIPPED [1] ../usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/source_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py:94: The previous and actual specifications are identical.
SKIPPED [1] ../usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/source_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py:377: The previous and actual discovered catalogs are identical.
================= 29 passed, 2 skipped, 31 warnings in 37.65s ==================

@darynaishchenko darynaishchenko merged commit 360e630 into master Jan 20, 2023
@darynaishchenko darynaishchenko deleted the daryna/source-typeform/fix-sat branch January 20, 2023 14:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants