Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Source Stripe: fix schema #22312

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Feb 15, 2023

Conversation

davydov-d
Copy link
Collaborator

@davydov-d davydov-d changed the title Source stripe fix schema Source Stripe: fix schema Feb 2, 2023
@davydov-d
Copy link
Collaborator Author

davydov-d commented Feb 2, 2023

/test connector=connectors/source-stripe

🕑 connectors/source-stripe https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/4075582961

@davydov-d
Copy link
Collaborator Author

davydov-d commented Feb 2, 2023

/test connector=connectors/source-stripe

🕑 connectors/source-stripe https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/4076177475
✅ connectors/source-stripe https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/4076177475
Python tests coverage:

Name                        Stmts   Miss  Cover
-----------------------------------------------
source_stripe/source.py        22      0   100%
source_stripe/__init__.py       2      0   100%
source_stripe/streams.py      308     28    91%
-----------------------------------------------
TOTAL                         332     28    92%
	 Name                                                    Stmts   Miss  Cover   Missing
	 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	 connector_acceptance_test/base.py                          12      4    67%   16-19
	 connector_acceptance_test/config.py                       141      5    96%   87, 93, 239, 243-244
	 connector_acceptance_test/conftest.py                     211     95    55%   36, 42-44, 49, 54, 77, 83, 89-91, 110, 115-117, 123-125, 131-132, 137-138, 143, 149, 158-167, 173-178, 193, 217, 248, 254, 262-267, 275-285, 293-306, 311-317, 324-335, 342-358
	 connector_acceptance_test/plugin.py                        69     25    64%   22-23, 31, 36, 120-140, 144-148
	 connector_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py              476    117    75%   53, 58, 97-108, 113-120, 124-125, 129-130, 380, 400, 438, 476-493, 506-517, 521-526, 532, 565-570, 608-615, 658-660, 663, 728-736, 748-751, 756, 812-813, 819, 822, 858-868, 881-906
	 connector_acceptance_test/tests/test_incremental.py       160     14    91%   58-65, 70-83, 246
	 connector_acceptance_test/utils/asserts.py                 39      2    95%   62-63
	 connector_acceptance_test/utils/common.py                  94     10    89%   16-17, 32-38, 72, 75
	 connector_acceptance_test/utils/compare.py                 62     23    63%   21-51, 68, 97-99
	 connector_acceptance_test/utils/connector_runner.py       133     33    75%   24-27, 46-47, 50-54, 57-58, 73-75, 78-80, 83-85, 88-90, 93-95, 124-125, 159-161, 208
	 connector_acceptance_test/utils/json_schema_helper.py     114     13    89%   31-32, 39, 42, 66-69, 97, 121, 203-205
	 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	 TOTAL                                                    1690    341    80%

Build Passed

Test summary info:

=========================== short test summary info ============================
SKIPPED [1] ../usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/connector_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py:98: The previous and actual specifications are identical.
SKIPPED [2] ../usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/connector_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py:516: Backward compatibility tests are disabled for version 1.0.1.
============ 53 passed, 3 skipped, 37 warnings in 941.69s (0:15:41) ============

@pedroslopez
Copy link
Contributor

@davydov-d I'm seeing some changes for both tiktok and stripe in this PR... is this intentional?

@davydov-d
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pedroslopez thanks for flagging this. No, it's not intentional. For some reason there we changes from this PR. I've merged latest master and now there are no more non-related changes

@davydov-d
Copy link
Collaborator Author

davydov-d commented Feb 14, 2023

/publish connector=connectors/source-stripe

🕑 Publishing the following connectors:
connectors/source-stripe
https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/4171503861


Connector Did it publish? Were definitions generated?
connectors/source-stripe

if you have connectors that successfully published but failed definition generation, follow step 4 here ▶️

@davydov-d davydov-d temporarily deployed to more-secrets February 15, 2023 10:08 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@davydov-d davydov-d temporarily deployed to more-secrets February 15, 2023 10:08 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@davydov-d
Copy link
Collaborator Author

strictness level will be changed here

@davydov-d davydov-d temporarily deployed to more-secrets February 15, 2023 10:56 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@davydov-d davydov-d temporarily deployed to more-secrets February 15, 2023 10:56 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@davydov-d davydov-d requested review from a team February 15, 2023 11:43
Copy link
Contributor

@alafanechere alafanechere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it failing for all the stripe connection using the invoice stream? If yes I think the backward incompatibility is legit. Please sync with @airbytehq/cloud-support before merge to make sure the breaking change introduction is understood and if a customer outreach is required.

@alafanechere
Copy link
Contributor

The QA checks are likely to fail, feel free to pull the changes from this PR #22886

@davydov-d
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test connector=connectors/source-stripe

@davydov-d davydov-d temporarily deployed to more-secrets February 15, 2023 12:13 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@davydov-d davydov-d temporarily deployed to more-secrets February 15, 2023 12:13 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@davydov-d
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The QA checks are likely to fail, feel free to pull the changes from this PR #22886

Thanks, pulled the changes from your PR! Regarding the release, it has already been scheduled with TCS and the outreach should have been made already

@davydov-d
Copy link
Collaborator Author

davydov-d commented Feb 15, 2023

/test connector=connectors/source-stripe

🕑 connectors/source-stripe https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/4183760383
✅ connectors/source-stripe https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/4183760383
Python tests coverage:

Name                                     Stmts   Miss  Cover
------------------------------------------------------------
source_stripe/source.py                     22      0   100%
source_stripe/__init__.py                    2      0   100%
source_stripe/streams.py                   311     27    91%
source_stripe/availability_strategy.py      19      2    89%
------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                                      354     29    92%
	 Name                                                    Stmts   Miss  Cover   Missing
	 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	 connector_acceptance_test/base.py                          12      4    67%   16-19
	 connector_acceptance_test/config.py                       142      5    96%   87, 93, 242, 246-247
	 connector_acceptance_test/conftest.py                     220    102    54%   37, 43-45, 50, 55, 60, 83, 89, 95-97, 116, 121-123, 129-131, 137-138, 143-144, 149, 160, 169-178, 184-189, 204, 228, 259, 265, 273-281, 289-302, 310-323, 328-334, 341-352, 359-375
	 connector_acceptance_test/plugin.py                        69     25    64%   22-23, 31, 36, 120-140, 144-148
	 connector_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py              476    117    75%   53, 58, 97-108, 113-120, 124-125, 129-130, 380, 400, 438, 476-493, 506-517, 521-526, 532, 565-570, 608-615, 658-660, 663, 728-736, 748-751, 756, 812-813, 819, 822, 858-868, 881-906
	 connector_acceptance_test/tests/test_incremental.py       162     14    91%   58-65, 70-83, 252
	 connector_acceptance_test/utils/asserts.py                 39      2    95%   62-63
	 connector_acceptance_test/utils/common.py                  94     10    89%   16-17, 32-38, 72, 75
	 connector_acceptance_test/utils/compare.py                 62     23    63%   21-51, 68, 97-99
	 connector_acceptance_test/utils/connector_runner.py       134     33    75%   30-33, 53-54, 57-61, 64-65, 80-82, 85-87, 90-92, 95-97, 100-102, 132-133, 167-169, 216
	 connector_acceptance_test/utils/json_schema_helper.py     114     13    89%   31-32, 39, 42, 66-69, 97, 121, 203-205
	 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	 TOTAL                                                    1716    348    80%

Build Passed

Test summary info:

=========================== short test summary info ============================
SKIPPED [1] ../usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/connector_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py:98: The previous and actual specifications are identical.
SKIPPED [2] ../usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/connector_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py:516: Backward compatibility tests are disabled for version 1.0.2.
============ 53 passed, 3 skipped, 37 warnings in 324.65s (0:05:24) ============

@davydov-d davydov-d temporarily deployed to more-secrets February 15, 2023 13:06 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@davydov-d davydov-d temporarily deployed to more-secrets February 15, 2023 13:06 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Copy link
Collaborator

@lazebnyi lazebnyi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Required CI builds looks good. Only one CI job is failed, because not enabled high strictness for GA. It will be implemented in #21419. We can move next to fix on-call issue.

@davydov-d
Copy link
Collaborator Author

davydov-d commented Feb 15, 2023

/publish connector=connectors/source-stripe

🕑 Publishing the following connectors:
connectors/source-stripe
https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/4184868607


Connector Did it publish? Were definitions generated?
connectors/source-stripe

if you have connectors that successfully published but failed definition generation, follow step 4 here ▶️

@airbyteio airbyteio temporarily deployed to more-secrets February 15, 2023 14:51 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@airbyteio airbyteio temporarily deployed to more-secrets February 15, 2023 14:51 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@davydov-d davydov-d temporarily deployed to more-secrets February 15, 2023 15:40 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@davydov-d davydov-d temporarily deployed to more-secrets February 15, 2023 15:40 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@davydov-d
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/approve-and-merge reason="A patch for the Stripe connector to resolve #1299 oncall issue"

@octavia-approvington
Copy link
Contributor

This is really good
simply the best

@octavia-approvington octavia-approvington merged commit 0ee920e into master Feb 15, 2023
@octavia-approvington octavia-approvington deleted the ddavydov/#1299-source-stripe-fix-schema branch February 15, 2023 16:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants