Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adjusting the error log statement #3584

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2024
Merged

adjusting the error log statement #3584

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2024

Conversation

Baalmart
Copy link
Contributor

@Baalmart Baalmart commented Oct 6, 2024

Description

adjusting the error log statement

Changes Made

  • adjusting the error log statement

Affected Services

  • Which services were modified:
    • Auth Service

API Documentation Updated?

  • Yes, API documentation was updated
  • No, API documentation does not need updating

Additional Notes

adjusting the error log statement

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated logging message for clarity regarding users without selected sites, now stating "Total count of users without any Customised Locations."

This change enhances the accuracy of logged information without impacting functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 6, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the logUserPreferences function within the preferences-log-job.js file. The primary modification involves updating the logging message to reflect a change in terminology, specifically from "Total count of users without selected_sites" to "Total count of users without any Customised Locations." This update does not affect the function's logic or control flow, which remains intact.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/auth-service/bin/jobs/preferences-log-job.js Updated logging message in logUserPreferences function to change terminology.

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In logs we find a tale so bright,
Of users lost from our sight.
"Customized Locations," now they say,
A clearer path to guide the way.
With each new log, our insights grow,
In code's embrace, we learn and flow! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 723c905 and 27e2d0a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/auth-service/bin/jobs/preferences-log-job.js (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/auth-service/bin/jobs/preferences-log-job.js

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 29.66%. Comparing base (7c508d5) to head (27e2d0a).
Report is 17 commits behind head on staging.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           staging    #3584      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    29.68%   29.66%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          185      185              
  Lines        25016    25016              
  Branches      3315     3315              
===========================================
- Hits          7426     7421       -5     
- Misses       17466    17471       +5     
  Partials       124      124              

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 6, 2024

Auth-service changes in this PR available for preview here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant