Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Fix unsynced data loss correctness test with mixed `-test_batches_sna…
…pshots` (facebook#9302) Summary: This fixes two bugs in the recently committed DB verification following crash-recovery with unsynced data loss (facebook#8966): The first bug was in crash test runs involving mixed values for `-test_batches_snapshots`. The problem was we were neither restoring expected values nor enabling tracing when `-test_batches_snapshots=1`. This caused a future `-test_batches_snapshots=0` run to not find enough trace data to restore expected values. The fix is to restore expected values at the start of `-test_batches_snapshots=1` runs, but still leave tracing disabled as we do not need to track those KVs. The second bug was in `db_stress` runs that restore the expected values file and use compaction filter. The compaction filter was initialized to use the pre-restore expected values, which would be `munmap()`'d during `FileExpectedStateManager::Restore()`. Then compaction filter would run into a segfault. The fix is just to reorder compaction filter init after expected values restore. Pull Request resolved: facebook#9302 Test Plan: - To verify the first problem, the below sequence used to fail; now it passes. ``` $ ./db_stress --db=./test-db/ --expected_values_dir=./test-db-expected/ --max_key=100000 --ops_per_thread=1000 --sync_fault_injection=1 --clear_column_family_one_in=0 --destroy_db_initially=0 -reopen=0 -test_batches_snapshots=0 $ ./db_stress --db=./test-db/ --expected_values_dir=./test-db-expected/ --max_key=100000 --ops_per_thread=1000 --sync_fault_injection=1 --clear_column_family_one_in=0 --destroy_db_initially=0 -reopen=0 -test_batches_snapshots=1 $ ./db_stress --db=./test-db/ --expected_values_dir=./test-db-expected/ --max_key=100000 --ops_per_thread=1000 --sync_fault_injection=1 --clear_column_family_one_in=0 --destroy_db_initially=0 -reopen=0 -test_batches_snapshots=0 ``` - The second problem occurred rarely in the form of a SIGSEGV on a file that was `munmap()`d. I have not seen it after this PR though this doesn't prove much. Reviewed By: jay-zhuang Differential Revision: D33155283 Pulled By: ajkr fbshipit-source-id: 66fd0f0edf34015a010c30015f14f104734e964e
- Loading branch information