Fixed problem with byte buffer overridden inside UDP listener #3218
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Horusiath
commented
Dec 20, 2017
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private void DoReceive(SocketAsyncEventArgs e, IActorRef handler) | ||
| { | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| handler.Tell(new Received(ByteString.FromBytes(e.Buffer, e.Offset, e.BytesTransferred), e.RemoteEndPoint)); | ||
| handler.Tell(new Received(ByteString.CopyFrom(e.Buffer, e.Offset, e.BytesTransferred), e.RemoteEndPoint)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The bug itself was here - we were creating ByteString directly from buffer assigned to a socket and the we continued to receive more bytes (no copying). When they arrived, they were overriding internal content of byte string we already passed to the user.
|
nice work @Horusiath |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes a bug reported by @blackclavus in #3210 . Also contains new test case for verification.