Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix schema syntax and naming #1217

Merged
merged 38 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024
Merged

fix: fix schema syntax and naming #1217

merged 38 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

vordimous
Copy link
Contributor

@vordimous vordimous commented Aug 27, 2024

Description

When comparing the zilla schema to the docs there were some syntax and naming inconsistencies. These changes address them.

Refer to the live reference docs update for implementation of docs types and defaults: https://vordimous.github.io/zilla-docs/next/reference/config/overview.html

@vordimous vordimous requested a review from jfallows August 27, 2024 16:19
@vordimous vordimous force-pushed the schema-syntax-edits branch from ba64a29 to 25f70b3 Compare August 30, 2024 14:02
@vordimous vordimous force-pushed the schema-syntax-edits branch from 25f70b3 to 28c8a4e Compare August 30, 2024 14:54
vordimous and others added 3 commits September 9, 2024 17:27
…x-edits

# Conflicts:
#	specs/binding-tls.spec/src/main/scripts/io/aklivity/zilla/specs/binding/tls/schema/tls.schema.patch.json
…x-edits

# Conflicts:
#	specs/binding-kafka.spec/src/main/scripts/io/aklivity/zilla/specs/binding/kafka/schema/kafka.schema.patch.json
@vordimous vordimous requested review from jfallows and removed request for jfallows September 13, 2024 20:39
Comment on lines 196 to 201
"entry":
{
"title": "Entry",
"type": "string",
"pattern": "^[a-zA-Z]+[a-zA-Z0-9\\._\\-]*$"
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's define this once at engine.schema.json level for any binding with REMOTE_SERVER kind, instead of defining separately per binding.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should have been removed from a revert commit. It is defined back the way it was.

@jfallows jfallows merged commit 9d5d4b3 into develop Sep 13, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants