-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 [Scrutiny] FAILED: SMART #880
Comments
I guess the error is here: Found a reference here: AnalogJ/scrutiny#305 |
Hi, you're using scrutiny full access the SYS_RAWIO is not needed as all permissions should be already granted... Have you tried the normal scrutiny (not fa)? Also, are you sure your ssd supports smart? Most ssd don't actually |
Yes I tested without FA but then it shows no device. The ssd I am using is providing SMART. |
@alexbelgium any ideas? Should I raise the issue at Scrutiny directly cause it is more related there? |
Hi, perhaps it's better... Honestly I tried to look a bit but no idea. I was wondering if accessing the influxdb through the admin interface could help but no idea what to look for |
I tried the same, but no idea of user/password. Is it a standard or the HA user/pw? Found user+pw but doesnt help me. |
@alexbelgium how can I put Scrutiny into debug mode. I just want to assure what the smartctl commands are returning. It seems that I need to run Scrutiny in debug mode but have no idea how. |
|
|
And SMART is enabled in BIOS. If I install proxmox on that device, smartctl is working. But on HAOS with your addon it isnt. |
I can finally say that the problem is definitely not the hardware. The add-on https://github.com/Draggon/hassio-hdd-tools is working on the same machine, I am getting all the SMART data with it. But weather Scrutiny nor Scrutiny-FA will give me any data for the hdd. |
That's super helpful, thanks for your investigations! I'll compare both addons |
I needed to disable protection mode but afterwards it just worked out. Initially testet directly within the container, compared to the tests I made with your Scrutiny add-ons - but as said with both I have no luck to get the SMART data. |
the hdd-tools is using both
you are only using this for scrutiny-fa and this for scrutiny
not sure if it is really related - but if you want to test, just release an update and I will do so ... |
well having both puts an alert message in the logs that made people remove the repo... About not being justified to have both full_access and privileges written. This can however be mimicked with Portainer if you are using the tool by switching on manually permissions |
Really? By adding permissions in addition to full access? crazy... I'll check the supervisor logs to see if there is an error showing |
Yes really. Just put that:
and now it works ... |
Thanks! Then I'll push a new official version (not just test), It will take 5 min to build |
Thanks for this great troubleshooting |
works now, thanks for great co-work and fast change + release! |
Description
Using a Intel NUC with M.2 SSD and Scrunity-FA with protection mode disabled. Can see the device /dev/sda but only get "SMART: FAILED". Even if I put device type from auto to sat.
Reproduction steps
Addon Logs
Architecture
aarch64
OS
HAos
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: