Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade check-dependencies from 1.1.0 to 2.0.0 #197

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alexeisnyk
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • package.json
    • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 125/1000
Why? Confidentiality impact: None, Integrity impact: None, Availability impact: High, Scope: Unchanged, Exploit Maturity: No data, User Interaction (UI): None, Privileges Required (PR): None, Attack Complexity: Low, Attack Vector: Network, EPSS: 0.01055, Social Trends: No, Days since published: 0, Reachable: No, Transitive dependency: Yes, Is Malicious: No, Business Criticality: High, Provider Urgency: High, Package Popularity Score: 99, Impact: 5.99, Likelihood: 2.08, Score Version: V5
Uncontrolled resource consumption
SNYK-JS-BRACES-6838727
Yes No Known Exploit
high severity 125/1000
Why? Confidentiality impact: None, Integrity impact: None, Availability impact: High, Scope: Unchanged, Exploit Maturity: No data, User Interaction (UI): None, Privileges Required (PR): None, Attack Complexity: Low, Attack Vector: Network, EPSS: 0.01055, Social Trends: No, Days since published: 0, Reachable: No, Transitive dependency: Yes, Is Malicious: No, Business Criticality: High, Provider Urgency: High, Package Popularity Score: 99, Impact: 5.99, Likelihood: 2.08, Score Version: V5
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
SNYK-JS-MICROMATCH-6838728
Yes No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: check-dependencies The new version differs by 61 commits.
  • 03c8847 Tag 2.0.0
  • 65d9ef5 Set Node.js requirement in package.json engines to >=18.3
  • 4917ab0 Simplify the spawn logic
  • fc04cc8 Drop support for the callback interface
  • 28257dd Tweak ESLint settings
  • dc16e8a Drop the bluebird devDependency
  • 412337a Drop fs-extra & graceful-fs devDependencies
  • 091279a Drop the findup-sync dependency
  • 10ac9c5 Drop lodash.camelcase & minimist dependencies
  • 35dce52 Update dependencies
  • 2929ba7 Update tested Node.js versions
  • 1f514eb Don't invoke `npm prune`, `npm install` is already enough
  • 65107d2 Drop support for Bower & the `checkCustomPackageNames` option
  • f28ba1b Avoid `git://` URLs, they're no longer supported
  • 8fdc6ad Limit allowed `packageManager` values
  • 9809f13 Bump word-wrap from 1.2.3 to 1.2.4 (Random #58)
  • e522471 Bump semver from 7.3.8 to 7.5.2 (Login page v2 #57)
  • 031416d Bump yaml from 2.2.1 to 2.2.2 (Vulnerable branch #56)
  • dff3ab9 Build: Fix running tests on Windows
  • 062005f Build: Update the GitHub Actions config
  • ecf138f Build: Update dependencies
  • 15c13b3 Build: Remove AppVeyor
  • 89b9df0 Build: Update .gitattributes to files always use LF line endings
  • db8c172 Build: Tweak GitHub Actions workflow code style

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Uncontrolled resource consumption

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants