Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: deprecate TestAsyncRecord #4407

Merged

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Aug 12, 2022

Summary

Remove the TestAsyncRecord test, as per discussion with @winder. The goal of this test was supposed to ensure that recording participation keys properly updates the db. The test does not test functionality that we wish to test and is also flaking on circle ci. Additionally, all the behavior we wish to verify is tested within test/scripts/e2e_subs/goal-partkey-commands.sh.

Test Plan

this is a test

@ghost ghost requested a review from winder August 12, 2022 19:59
@ghost ghost self-assigned this Aug 12, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 12, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #4407 (b0bc71d) into master (07341cd) will decrease coverage by 0.23%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4407      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.57%   55.34%   -0.24%     
==========================================
  Files         400      400              
  Lines       50797    50797              
==========================================
- Hits        28231    28112     -119     
- Misses      20169    20311     +142     
+ Partials     2397     2374      -23     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
node/node.go 4.43% <0.00%> (-18.83%) ⬇️
node/impls.go 0.00% <0.00%> (-18.52%) ⬇️
ledger/roundlru.go 90.56% <0.00%> (-5.67%) ⬇️
catchup/service.go 68.14% <0.00%> (-0.50%) ⬇️
ledger/acctonline.go 79.00% <0.00%> (+0.52%) ⬆️
network/wsPeer.go 67.67% <0.00%> (+2.19%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants