Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New keyreg txn field #244

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Feb 14, 2022
Merged

New keyreg txn field #244

merged 13 commits into from
Feb 14, 2022

Conversation

shiqizng
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds a new field, stateProofKey, to key reg txn to match the changes in algod.

@shiqizng shiqizng self-assigned this Oct 25, 2021
@jasonpaulos jasonpaulos self-requested a review November 1, 2021 23:33
algosdk/future/transaction.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
algosdk/future/transaction.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
algosdk/future/transaction.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
algosdk/future/transaction.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@jasonpaulos jasonpaulos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just some comments on the model file, which I don't think is used anyway

algosdk/v2client/models/account_participation.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
algosdk/v2client/models/account_participation.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
algosdk/v2client/models/account_participation.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@id-ms id-ms marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2022 22:55
Copy link
Contributor

@jasonpaulos jasonpaulos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Though once stateproofs are merged into master, I would like to do a quick review again

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants