feat: receipt root fn #1708
Merged
feat: receipt root fn #1708
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
klkvr
force-pushed
the
matt/add-receipt-proofs
branch
from
b207bf6 to
9428946
Compare
klkvr
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
tried to make this work because would be useful for reth, but there are some conflicting designs.
we need 2718 for the root, the alloy
ReceiptEnvelopealready wrapsReceiptWithBloom<Receipt>reth's equivalent isenum Receipt {EIP155(Receipt)}and then we havehttps://github.com/paradigmxyz/reth/blob/b09c345257cda4a88e8e347654e946a20f9e5cb7/crates/primitives/src/receipt.rs#L418-L418
not quite sure yet, how to unify this on alloy