Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

play-pause not working with spotifyd (the pausing part) #261

Closed
Nicceboy opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

play-pause not working with spotifyd (the pausing part) #261

Nicceboy opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Nicceboy
Copy link

Nicceboy commented Nov 24, 2021

I am not sure if spotifyd is officially supported, but it works pretty well with playerctl.

However, there is one command playerctl play-pause which does not pause when attempting to pause the media. Also other variations are not working e.g.

─➤  G_MESSAGES_DEBUG=playerctl playerctl --player spotifyd play-pause
(playerctl:3131): playerctl-DEBUG: 02:22:35.285: Getting list of player names from D-Bus
(playerctl:3131): playerctl-DEBUG: 02:22:35.286: Playerctld is running. Getting names from there.
(playerctl:3131): playerctl-DEBUG: 02:22:35.286: Getting list of player names from D-Bus
(playerctl:3131): playerctl-DEBUG: 02:22:35.751: initializing player: spotifyd

Starting of playing works with the same command, and other commands I have tried so far.
Pausing works with playerctl pause

I'm using the latest package from Arch repository

─➤  pacman -Qs playerctl
local/playerctl 2.4.1-1
    mpris media player controller and lib for spotify, vlc, audacious, bmp, xmms2, and others.
@pietryszak
Copy link

pietryszak commented Dec 2, 2021

playerctl --player spotifyd play
playerctl --player spotifyd pause workig fine
playerctl play-pause not working for me.

And I think It's related with Spotifyd Bug 1018

@Nicceboy
Copy link
Author

Nicceboy commented Dec 3, 2021

Okay. It seems that we need to wait for upstream fix then!

@Nicceboy
Copy link
Author

Nicceboy commented Dec 9, 2021

This is fixed on the upstream now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants