Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Deleting the issue of breaking changes with no explanations? #107

Closed
mindaugasvcs opened this issue Jan 14, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Deleting the issue of breaking changes with no explanations? #107

mindaugasvcs opened this issue Jan 14, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@mindaugasvcs
Copy link

Wow, wow, wow. Really?
Why are you wasting your time with this lib?

P.S.: This is my last question, no worries, won't bother you no more. Narcissistic people.
@kelunik
Copy link
Member

kelunik commented Jan 14, 2022 •
edited
Loading

I've closed your previous issue as I felt is had been answered, I haven't deleted anything.

I really don't like your tone here, so I'm closing this one as well.

@kelunik kelunik closed this as completed Jan 14, 2022
@mindaugasvcs
Copy link
Author

This does not change things much. You just distance yourself from the answer as I'm now left in the unknown as to what to do.

@mindaugasvcs
Copy link
Author

Also you should not be a maintainer of this lib if my questions is out of your scope.

@kelunik
Copy link
Member

kelunik commented Jan 14, 2022

You're using an open source project. You haven't bought a product with a support contract. I don't have the time to do the research for you. If you want to use an unreleased version, you'll need to do it yourself or pay someone to do it for you. In fact, the same is true for any released version. We usually provide changelogs, but there's neither a guarantee for that nor a guarantee that the changelog is complete.

TheTechsTech added a commit to symplely/ext-uv that referenced this issue Mar 30, 2023
@TheTechsTech
release ready, reverted signatures, bug fixes, no pecl needed
3793357 
**In reference to:** amphp#106, amphp#107, amphp#94, amphp#98, amphp#93, amphp#92, amphp#86, amphp#84, amphp#82, amphp#64

- BC signature changes has been revert since some of the tests wasn't changed to match, and too far off original design.
- Using current **Libuv** version or systems installed one, not `pecl`, this setup is not reliant on the really slow `pecl` system for updated installations.

The whole `uv_queue_work()` will need to be re implemented, the core internal `TSRM.c` thread related `tsrm_***_interpreter_context` functions used in PHP 7.4 has been removed since PHP 8.0.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@kelunik @mindaugasvcs