[AMP-119883] Removed References to isActive in WNA Docs

[jay-jg1]

Summary

We've removed isActive field from bulk model management, as show in the PR here
https://github.com/amplitude/nova/commit/d029960aba383244ad71f37978166ee0cd064ff7

We'll need to update our documentation accordingly. I removed isActive references that is found throughout the docs. Not much risk here.

Testability

isactive.mov

We'll need to verify the push through pipeline and then verify that there aren't any weird docs issues when it touches prod. Even with the above template, it's not truly 1:1.

Maybe there's a way to 100% test docs locally? I'll need to sync with @xiaowuc1 on this.

EDIT: Additionally, do we have to coordinate the push to prod with anyone? Or let people know that docs are changing?

Or is this just something that’s good to change as soon as we can. Ideally should we have the original PR push alongside this type of docs PR?

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
amplitude-docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Dec 4, 2024 4:00am

[jay-jg1]

All checks passing, which is nice.

[jay-jg1]

Let me git blame some other fields and make sure I'm pertaining to whatever style or commit structure we do for field changes within docs.

[jay-jg1]

Let me git blame some other fields and make sure I'm pertaining to whatever style or commit structure we do for field changes within docs.

Never mind, we bulk committed this and haven't removed any references before (as far as I can see). I'm assuming small nuances like commit messages and separate branch for merge, and one PR for all removals are OK. If so, then looks good to me.